VideoXploiter This is a fascinating case of a movie acting as a loose sequel to one movie in name, and to another (namely 1982's Slumber Party Massacre) courtesy of a flashback sequence. It also has it's OWN sequel in the form of 'Hard to Die', which was released the same year, and made by the same director (Jim Wynorski). The common thread between all these films?: boobs & blood. Another interesting note is the character Orville Ketchum, brilliantly under-played by Peter Spellos, who is featured in both this movie and 'Hard to Die'. In fact, both films are an essential double-feature.

Pumpkin_Man I liked that this movie was different than the original, much like Prom Night II or Halloween III. This was made in the Golden Era of cheesy slasher films. It was okay, but I loved the original a lot better. The original was so cliché and basically ripped off Halloween, which I loved. This one introduces a more supernatural tone with the girls playing with an ouija board. (I haven't seen The Slumber Party Massacre all the way through yet, but I'm pretty sure they used a clip from that movie to explain the killer's past in this one. So, are these two series connected, or did they hope no one would notice?)Five girls buy the old Hokstatter place where some brutal murders took place 5 years before. (No relation to the original film) They talk awhile, act girly, eat cheap food and search around the house. Soon, they find an old ouija board and begin playing with it. Little do they know, they awaken the spirit of the killer. The script is pretty weak, it's filled with nude women and cheesy death scenes (In fact, you can see the shadow of a crew man spraying blood on the wall during a death scene.) It was okay, but I still much prefer the original. If you love campy B-movies, you might enjoy SORORITY HOUSE MASSACRE 2!!!

BA_Harrison A group of young women (played by five untalented, but big-breasted B-movie actresses who are obviously too old for their roles) move into their recently acquired sorority house. After slipping into their smallest items of lingerie, the girls unwisely decide to spend their first night in their new home dabbling with a Ouija board, calling up the spirit of a murderer who massacred his family in the very same house several years before. Sometimes, people in horror films just deserve to get killed...Director Jim Wynorski, a man not exactly renowned for his high-brow movie making, ladles on the cheese in this deliberately campy sequel to Sorority House Massacre, which forgoes genuine scares in favour of a tongue-in-cheek approach. Cheap, cheerful, and totally devoid of logic, Wynorski's film is never intended to be anything other than trashy fun, and, in that, I suppose it succeeds: viewers are offered a couple of prolonged shower scenes, a creepy weirdo who may or may not also be a killer, two useless detectives whose only purpose is to make possible a scene in a pole dancing joint (which briefly features deceased porn star Savannah as a stripper), flashbacks to a totally unconnected movie (The Slumber Party Massacre), and several unconvincing death scenes complete with hokey gore.Lacking any decent acting and direction, or any semblance of originality, Sorority House Massacre 2 is the kind of film best watched after a few beers have numbed the senses slightly and one's tolerance for puerile garbage is slightly higher than usual.

daniel blair This film was just plain poor. The effects, plot and acting were absolutely abominable, the fact that the film was actually a horror was unrecognisable. The only reason i pursued in watching it was because it made me laugh above all else, also the actresses playing the students were rather tasty. I wouldn't recommend watching this film if you are looking to be genuinely frightened, as it comes across as more of a spoof than anything, however it is quite entertaining just for the women and the poor acting skills shown by them. I do like how the director added some interesting shot of the girls going upstairs whilst wearing only lingerie.