syfyhallmarkfan Stonehenge is a great location with some mystery built into the setting, and I love watching the campy movies that Syfy makes. (Wish there were more like this!) The plot and action moved along nicely, so this one was fairly easy to watch, with few lulls. It's not high art, but we aren't really expecting that, are we? Loved that opening scene, where a tour group gets to go right up to the stones, and what luck!, they are the only ones visiting that day! The mountains in the background are especially beautiful. Who knew? The actors were mostly fine; their accents were all over the place sometimes, which was distracting. I liked the lead (Robot head!). One of the scientists really pulled off the manpri look. In several scenes. As for actual "science" and "believability," there's no reason to try to reconcile those ideas with a Syfy production. But seriously, they go from England to New York and back again in how many hours? It seemed like about two. But good work, cause the world will probably explode if they waste too much time. Overall, good. Not boring but not super-exciting or wacky-funny.

joihn bailey Now don,t get me wrong I like a good adventure as much as the next person,aliens prophecies,conspiracies etc. so the story line was OK.BUT everything else PUHLEASE!Only 3 actors had English accents,wrong rank insignia,mountains on Salisbury Plain (not the last time I went},a gigantic English primary school built like no others, complete with basket ball hall!,all vehicles left hand drive including a Humvee.Stonehenge obviously computer generated with wrong grass(north American grass is different) and as you say over there,much,much more but I can,t go on.It must have cost a couple of million dollars spoiled by a few cents.Sorry one last thing.A US general turns up, takes charge on British soil,at one of our most precious monuments and a World Heritage Site to boot,I don,t think so.

carolyn-140 This is such a bad movie it is truly splendid. From the bad English accents on the part of the lesser speaking roles - my who knew so many South Africans were serving in the British Army? - to the totally daft depiction of of Stonehenge itself with regard to the number of stones, their locations, access and location on one of the maps towards the end it is simply a fabulously bad film. I recommend you gather friends, get popcorn and maybe some beer etc. and then have a contest to see the biggest plot holes, nutty omissions and abysmal script. I won't blame the actors, they did the very best they could with the words they were given. I hope their contracts included counselling as they realised their careers were pretty much dead after this and a new avenue was the only way forward. Re: Stonehenge the errors, when I was little anyone could just walk up to Stonehenge and see it, touch it. But that has not been the case for decades. Now you park across the main road, walk over and look at it from a distance. Unless you are a Druid and even then only at the summer solstice. There is no thick long grass around it where the hero can hide. Love it, love it, love it. So bad it deserves an Oscar.

bluejohnno I can't believe some of the reviews on this.If you are watching this film for anything other than comedy value, what happens when you watch a really good film? Does your head explode?The accents were awful. The acting was worse. the science was shonky. The locations were abysmal. An earlier reviewer stated that they thought they paid attention to the little details. Really? Salisbury Plain in the middle of a forest with mountains in the background. Supposedly British army units in Hummers and some weird hybrid German/Jeep thing. Damn hilarious though!