marymorrissey if a subject is worthy of making a doc about I don't know what's with all the belles and whistles. it was clearly a matter of Ms. Swinson being available to come in for a day. there was some kind of a disclaimer "the Artist who was persecuted is too sensitive to portray himself so he's portrayed by an Actor" well the guy playing opposite her was no Actor so her little ball busting turns didn't play that well. was it really all that they could come up with to depict the defenseless dead Frau as this bitch who has one thing on her mind: complaining about the Art not being done in a timely manner in both of her scenes, like some producer? oh and she not exactly lovingly pushes this brown suit and ugly tie on the Artist contemptuously remarking that she got them on sale as if that mitigates her hopeless attempt in her comme des garcons or whatever and chic hairdo to do something about this tardy ass slob she married who is making a living hell of her self starting detail oriented efforts at office management. in fact the actual husband's brief talking head appearance directly following these scenes indicates that her 'editing' and "gift for pattern recognition" were essential to the team's work. it would have made much more sense for her to be upset that she was not going to be able to have a look at this "material" herself before it "went out" instead of just fretting about a deadline for this show that was already booked as though it would be canceled or something. Actually, Tilly's day playing reminded me a a little of that early comic bit of Meryl streep as the castrating lesbian in "manhattan"! and of course she looked as incongruous opposite the schlub portraying her husband as Ms streep did opposite Mr. allen.for the first 30 minutes or so, interspersed with talking head clips, which actually render them superfluous, we get a bonanza of these totally trite, not ready for prime-time reenactments in "Docudrama" form of 1) a couple of teacher/student scenes (I don't know how low the standards of SUNY Buffalo have gotten, but I would imagine most students at any college aside from maybe the University of Miami would be familiar with "the McCarthy era" from their high school US history class), 2) the obligatory cheesy "artistic integrity" scene ("the McCarthy era" prof who wears a different wild n crazy shirt in every scene a collaborator of the Artist who is far too serious about his Work darling to "go Hawaiian" or to wear a suit for that matter, has misgivings about an Idea, "Ok I get this cause I'm weird and I'm your friend but I don't know if it's such a great CAREER MOVE!" of course as any Artist worth his salt would, our hero has to get really real man, explaining the concept of Artistic Integrity both for us and for the professor. 3) the aforementioned BB. scenes between Tilda and the Artist, 4) the absolute pits: the scene in which the Artist discovers the corpse of his wife. which this performer was not at all up to (a note to the director: when an 'actor' is whimpering and screwing up his face pretending to cry but no tears come use eye drops!) in which they really might have done something to make it less obvious that Ms. Swinon was no longer in the building - all we see is a hand! and 5) the initial confrontations with the fuzz n the feds. After we've sat through all of this double iteration of the preceding information? We're treated to A RECAP of almost every bit of the same, this time in hipster graphic novel format! (the producers of the film apparently refer to this all encompassing style as "docurama" for what that's worth) The "docurama" format sucked in "American Splendor" too as far as I'm concerned but at least in that film they had real actors involved for the long haul not just one star coming in for a day, as in some cheesy B picture in which someone given top billing turns out only to turn up in 2 scenes. And they may have pointlessly, tastelessly and annoyingly switched formats but at least they didn't repeat scenes 3 times apiece!As far as I'm concerned they definitely ought to have just stuck with the talking heads, only for some reason it was deemed OK to "grab" some of the doc footage with really crappy sound and inadequate light and when the artist himself is actually introduced the camera even slips a bit: oops! I mean why not retake the shot or make some kind of cut or something. eliminate him saying, "I'm Steve Kurtz, the Artist" while the camera slips, since they put his damn name in a title on top of his little bit anyway, and didn't have anybody else introduce themselves in this fashion!?!?! I can't deal with this kind of carelessness and neither should you. As you might expect though, when Ms. S was working they actually bothered to use microphones and get proper sound and the lighting was more or less adequate. How much better it would have been to take some of the wasted time to interview some of the fuzz 'n' feds involved (not that it's likely though they would have been as cooperative as Tilly) than to indulge in all this inept playacting and decoration and duplication stretching the film to 70 min (I believe, for you see, I didn't even get to the part with peter coyote, by then I turned it off life is too short and it was better to read about what happened online, just as one other review here suggests might be a better alternative). I loathed this film and was forced to give it the lowest possible rating!

Seamus2829 At long last. A short,but compelling documentary that blows the lid off of two issues that have been making news of one kind or another: genetically modified foods (or GMO's),and the shoddy treatment of creative artists, in the guise of Homeland Security's usual draconian tactics. One element concerns an artist that was getting an art piece ready for an exhibition, that brought to light the concern of GMO's in our food. The artists wife suffers a heart attack & dies. When the artist phones the police for assistance,they arrive,finding the materials for the exhibit,along with some Arabic writing, and assume that the artist is some kind of a bio terrorist,and promptly arrests him. What follows is will break your heart & anger you. The screening I attended had a member of the ACLU present to answer questions that related to the incident (the court case is still pending).

lion-23 i was blown away by this movie. It is nothing you would expect. It creeps up on you. It is a truly important film, and extremely timely. The footage is remarkable and varied. It is as if the film turns itself inside out so that you are right there, inside the movie, sitting right next to the actors, who are sharing intimate moments of themselves, candidly and without guile. The identity device is brilliant, and took me by surprise, even though there were clues along the way. The way the various elements were handled, from the comic strips to re enactments to interviews were skillful and well crafted. This is one of the the films that can make a difference because it brings an awareness of the repercussions of policies to a human level. I highly recommend this film.

KELLY This is an important movie to watch, especially for young adults and/or patriotic Americans who may not have heard about a tragic period in US history referred to as McCarthyism: a period when the government led an aggressive campaign against its own citizens looking for communist sympathizers- there was even a "House of Un-American Activities Committee" formed. Thousands were threatened, blacklisted, and arrested - mainly teachers, artists, folks in the entertainment business and government employees - guilty of nothing other than free thought.Since 9/11, we and our government are acting hysterically. The events as captured in this film are evidence."Some of the basic principles of Americanism: The right to criticize; The right to hold unpopular beliefs; The right to protest; The right of independent thought." from Statement of Senator Margaret Chase Smith, June 1, 1950