paulg-67221 Terrible acting, plot, ending etc. It's a rare occurrence a found footage movie is any good (the only 3 good ones I've seen are Chronicle, not horror but still good, and Rec 1 and 2). The reason so many found footage films got made at one point is because they are easy, cheap and require little effort to make. Give anyone an HD camera, around ten to fifteen grand, a location, two weeks to film and six months to edit, literally anyone can make a found footage horror. The thing that will always live on in infamy is the ending. I have a few other points but I'll address this one first. It ends with a caption stating that if the view wants to know more then they must visit a website. If it had just cut to black, it would be annoying but it would be tolerable. You wouldn't accept it if a book sold its final chapter separately or if a game releases its ending as DLC so why should you be forced to search a website to finish the story you pay to experience in the first place?The one part I found really stupid was in the scene where they are evaluating the possessed lady and she starts singing Itsy Bitsy Spider and the main character gets caught up and sings along. I found this scene particularly stupid because that song we saw footage of the main character singing Itsy Bitsy Spider should in no way produce a response like that. It's a nurse rhyme that everyone knows, it has no personal value. A movie that does this kind of thing well was Big, where Tom Hanks sings a song to convince his friend it's really him, why did it work? Because it was a song the characters made up together and is a symbol of their friendship. If she sang a song she had written for her daughter and sang it to her when she was little, this moment would be justified.Another stupid scene was after a priest almost drowned a baby at a baptism. How did he not get arrested for that? There is video evidence of him doing it and there are hundreds (probably) of witnesses. Yet he manages to get back home (seemingly) without issue.The dialogue is awful. In one scene after the baptism, the cameraman is asked "is he in trouble?" and he cameraman replied he didn't know. I just yelled to myself "OF COURSE HE'S IN TROUBLE, HE JUST NEARLY KILLED A KID." Also, the dialogue just seems to extend the scenes for no real reason, it takes like 2-3 minutes for a character to finally say what happened when a single sentence would do. Avoid this movie, it just ain't worth it. Boring, lazy and shoddy. 1/10.

Python Hyena The Devil Inside (2012): Dir: William Brent Bell / Dir: Fernanda Andrade, Simon Quarterman, Evan Helmuth, Suzan Crowley, Bonnie Morgan: Here is yet another nauseating so-called true story marketing ploy that shakes the camera about to the point where throwing up on the movie screen would improve the picture. It is a lame supernatural thriller about the presence of evil, such as the way they market this crap. It begins with promise featuring a 911 call where an apparent exorcism concluded with several dead bodies. Now the possessed is in Italy or Rome, or some bloody place where they shacked her up in a rubber room, and her dimwitted daughter decides to document her visit after twenty years. This cannot end well for these morons nor the audience who has to sit through it. Director William Brent Bell strikes up tremendous images of Rome and Italy and such but he cannot save the actors from themselves. When Fernanda Andrade, who plays the daughter, becomes possessed, any so-called true story account goes straight down the shitter with any other brilliant logic the screenwriter concocted during a night of heavy drinking. There are two pea brain Priests, one who becomes possessed and attempts to drown a baby during a baptism. Then there is the mother who cuts herself and likely removed herself from any Mother's Day card delivery. Either that or she just became so upset at this career move that she attempts suicide to remove the embarrassment. We witness the twitching and distorted possessed bodies who are in such agony, nobody is in more agony than the poor saps viewing its spectacle. Score: 4 / 10

theblackscythe (Halloween Horror Reviews #11)If you are a lover of horror cinema then please heed my warning. There are very few films that I will beg you not to see, this is one of them. But above this, know that:This film is a lie.Every thing contained in the film's advertising is a lie, it is not scary, it is not shocking and it isn't even complete. I feel no shame in listing this review as 'Non-spoiler', because there is nothing to spoil. This is among the most predictable and generic horror films I have ever seen. Nothing of originality, nothing to offer a veteran horror fan, and even less for a newcomer to the genre. When I rate a film 1 star, I mean to say that not only does the film have no value, it has anti-value. It causes nothing but harm to its peers and embarrasses an entire community of films by association.The film's acting is a joke. Delivered with the passion of an Ikea lamp, and with the originality of bad haircut. The 'main characters' are unlikable assholes, portrayed as much through the dialogue as the acting. The film's 'script' is a dirty, sodden dishcloth, every jump-scare is a stain upon it. This horrendously trite slice of nothingness failed to even achieve an 85 min runtime, likely because they avoided inconveniences such as character or plot. The film cares so little for its audience that it even insults the .01% of said audience who enjoyed it. It does this by failing to end. The film has NO ENDING. The last frame of the film is a link to a now defunct web domain (the studio was so cheap it only paid for 6 months on the website, a website referenced in every version of the film!).This crap surpasses Frankenstein (1994) as the worst horror film I have ever reviewed. It's monumental financial success is a testament to how we have all been played for cattle, steered into the corporate slaughterhouse and reduced to chowder.

CMTiago I'd say that's about 90 minutes of my life I'll never get back. What complete garbage this movie is. No plot to follow and it just felt like it was rehashing of "real life" events. Not to mention that the acting and direction were atrocious. I don't understand how people can waste their money on something like this. I'd really like to know what the whole point of watching these movies are. Thank god some people have the decency to vote this low and its official rating should be even lower. To point out how laughably bad this was, I literally laughed my ass off in one exorcism scene. This is how mediocre and dumb this movie can get. This is really one of those movies in which you should listen to the bad reviews and comments, as it is not even worthy of being mentioned as a bad movie. Time wasting is what this is.