The Diamond Wizard

1954 "3000 Miles Of Desperate Man-Hunt!"
The Diamond Wizard
5.7| 1h23m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 28 July 1954 Released
Producted By: United Artists
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

While in London trying to nab several fugitives who stole a million dollars from a U.S. Treasury vault, American federal agent Dennison (Dennis O'Keefe) assists Scotland Yard Insp. McClaren (Philip Friend) in his search for a missing atomic scientist (Paul Hardtmuth). The detective duo discovers that the key to solving both cases may rest with the scientist's daughter (Margaret Sheridan) and her fascinating diamond.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

United Artists

Trailers & Images

Reviews

gavin6942 An American Treasury agent (Dennis O'Keefe) teams up with a Scotland Yard inspector (Philip Friend) to track down a group of thieves that are creating artificial diamonds out of sugar.This film seems to be a bit of a mystery. The BFI considers it lost, despite prints being readily available -- even on YouTube and Netflix. And then the director is a bit of a debate. Whether the print is the American or English one, the director name is switched. The film itself does not seem to be different in different prints.The plot is pretty good, and the idea of synthetic diamonds is interesting. One has to wonder... could synthetic diamonds be made so well that there would be no real chemical difference?
blanche-2 Likable actor Dennis O'Keefe made a couple of films in England in the '50s. "The Diamond Wizard" from 1954 is his baby all the way - he wrote the original story using a pseudonym (Jonathan Rix), he directed it, and he starred in it.O'Keefe plays Joe Dennison, a Treasury Dept. investigator in England trying to find a gang who stole a million dollars from a treasury vault and also killed his partner. One of the criminals apparently is in England to buy fake diamonds, though they realize he must be coming by ship because he as of yet isn't in England.The Scotland Yard inspector, McClaren, is working with Dennison on the case while also searching for Dr. Eric Miller, an atomic scientist who has disappeared. His daughter, who came to England to join her father, has a broach with phony diamonds, made by her father. So is he somehow involved with the thieves? This isn't a very interesting film until the end, where the location is an incredible castle. The whole end moves at a great pace, is suspenseful and atmospheric. I wish the whole movie had been that way. It's odd in the way it starts out as somewhat light, with both men competing for the missing man daughter's affections, and then has this big ending. Both lead actors, O'Keefe and Philip Friend (the inspector) are very charming.The story is derivative, but I love the idea of the phony diamonds -- there are so many of these today, and they even mention Moissan, whose product, Moissanite is available (and expensive) today.
Michael O'Keefe Also known as THE DIAMOND is directed, written and stars Dennis O'Keefe. American federal agent Joe Dennison travels to London in search for clever fugitives suspected of stealing a million dollars from a U.S. Treasury vault. Dennison will team up with Inspector McClaren(Philip Friend)of Scotland Yard and do double duty helping his British counterpart. The two detectives share in the hunt for a missing atomic scientist Dr. Eric Miller(Paul Hardmuth), who is believed to be deeply involved in a ring pushing fake diamonds. Dennison and McClaren, who Dennison calls Mac), get the idea that solving both crimes may rest with the scientist's daughter Marline(Margaret Sheridan). Plot and pace are top notch. Other players: Michael Balfour, Gudrun Ure, Seymour Green and Alan Wheatley.
lemon_magic I liked this movie just fine, but there's no real reason to seek it out - it echoes and rehashes the plot points of dozens of earlier films (and even films about using artificial diamonds to control the economy).The most unusual thing about it is the filmmakers decision to incorporate 3D into the film...which seems absolutely pointless given the prosaic nature of the material and the sturdy, workmanlike lighting, set design and photography on display here. I saw the "2D" version on a TV (of course), and it was pretty obvious where the 3D shots were supposed to go...and they wouldn't have added a thing to the viewing experience except maybe for sheer novelty value.Still, for all its limitations, there's a lot of talent and craftsmanship to be found - the interplay between the hero and his British counterpart is fun to watch; the actors keep up the pace in dialog and exposition heavy scenes that might have otherwise been a drag; the two women in the case are respectively snazzy and adorable; and there are a couple of setups and shots (especially the final chase and shoot out on a wooden escalator) that Hitchcock himself might have approved.The movie's almost total obscurity is perhaps undeserved...a decent time waster, in any case.