benjaminsaikhellgren
My dad bought this for 1 dollar and it sucked.The acting was awful and story was bad. The background music was awful didn't fit in at all. The clothing doesn't make sense, a girl is walking around in a bikini... seriously. I only watched 10 minutes of it! I almost died of boredom. If it had a higher budget it would probably be better. SO Don't BUY IT!!!! Even if someone sells it for 1 cent or for free! Its not worth to exist so burn it or sell it.this line is for other stuff that you shouldn't care about this line is for other stuff that you shouldn't care about this line is for other stuff that you shouldn't care about
a-kastenas
I was just wondering, why would anyone produce this film?I think it must have been quite obvious, that after adding all the clips together the final product was extremely terrible.We can congratulate people for trying to make something, and this must have been a fun experience for a group of friends who made it.I would recommend this film only to relatives and friends of those who were taking part in this project, other than that I would urge anyone to avoid this by any means.Verdict: Home made movie for family members and friends, that should have have never been available to larger audiences.Good luck, and let it be a good practice, as there is a lot space for improvement.Regards,Aj
marksdavid33
Got a chance to see this epic last night, and let me tell you it's an awesome flick. It has everything a low budget horror film needs to make me happy: Gore, nudity, and insanity. The best way to describe this movie is Max Headroom on crack. Every scene is packed with pure absurdism and oddball characters and for you movie buffs out there, there's a kitchen sink approach to homages. You'll notice references to Mad Max, Terminator, Brazil, 1984, Total Recall, Jacob's Ladder and Westworld. As a fan of Astron 6, I can dig the 80's style that this movie was trying to re-create. Unlike the Astron 6 films it's hard to figure out if this is a parody or a straight attempt to make a serious film. The plot revolves around a time traveler who's trying to alter the future by meeting up with a "star child" who has unexplained superpowers and a crazy scientist hellbent on destroying the world. I think it fits a niche audience and for cinephiles (like myself) this is a tour de force of psychotronic filmmaking.
Curtis G.
Forbidden Dimensions is a loving, accomplished (if not entirely period-accurate) homage to '80s straight-to-video science-fiction post-apocalyptic time-traveling rubber-mask monster movies.Story? Let me give it a shot. Jack Slade is an S.E.K.—a "solar eclipse kid"—who finds himself jumping back and forth in time—from 1998 to 2035 and back again. He works for the Kronos Corporation, which in 1998 creates a "wavelength generator" that brings aliens into our dimension. The maniacal Dr. Schector then uses alien tissue to, um, do some stuff, thereby destroying the world. As the last surviving S.E.K., it's up to Jack to find some chick named Khadija in 2035 and stop Kronos and Schector (who looks and sounds like he's fronting an '80s metal band) in 1998. I think. It's weird in spades right from the get-go, and things get even more confusing near the end. I would have preferred a slightly more linear story with less jumping around. But whatever.Overly ambitious? Well, define "overly." I am a big supporter of independent filmmaking and I understand how hard it is to even get a movie made, so I will let an indie get away with a lot of things I'd criticize a big-budget movie for. FD is either unintentionally bad or lovingly bad. I prefer to think it's lovingly bad. Do not take this movie seriously. It is what it is, and it knows it. As such, there's no such thing as a goof. Post-2010 cars in 1998? Crew walking around in the background? It's all good.FD displays all the trappings of a bad '80s movie: shots that last much longer than they should, bordering on indulgent; overly expository, on-the-nose dialog ("I have to save the future!"); actors taking extra time with movements to be sure the camera is seeing it. The dialog is not just unsubtle, but often it seems like characters are having two separate conversations.I love the total lack of adherence to medical reality (the "reverse embryo" scene in particular); that is, the total impossibility of it. It's as if writer-director Chris J. Miller had a bunch of weird ideas and just decided to cram them all in, whether they made sense or not. Evidently a lot of the budget went to practical makeup effects. The weak-of-stomach should probably avoid this one.There is a pact between B-movie makers and the audience, and the director knows it: Namely, if we're going to watch your low-budget movie, we want boobies. Miller delivers. He also gets very good performances from most of the rest of his (non-nude) cast, which was unexpected. Detective Giger is a hoot. Based on the trailers on the DVD, I gather he's a recurring character in Miller's movies. Shot compositions are remarkably good, and there's interesting and clever integration of original footage with "guerrilla" footage shot on location at Wasteland Weekend. There are some interesting real-world locations, and even a pretty cool "sci-fi corridor" set.If I have one complaint, it would be the overuse of different fonts for super cards and too many modern video effects. That said, there are enough '80s-era video graphics to satisfy purists. FD features great original music, plus an extra bonus: the same music that Epic Meal Time uses!Is it logical? No. Easy to follow the story? Not really. But is it fun to watch? Absolutely.Final note: If you pirated this movie and then didn't buy a legit copy, you suck. If you pirated it and then gave it a bad rating, there is a special place in Hell for you.
