The Fundamentals of Caring

2016 "Caring is a funny thing."
7.3| 1h37m| R| en| More Info
Released: 16 June 2016 Released
Producted By: Levantine Entertainment
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: https://www.netflix.com/title/80097349
Synopsis

Having suffered a tragedy, Ben becomes a caregiver to earn money. His first client, Trevor, is a hilarious 18-year-old with muscular dystrophy. One paralyzed emotionally, one paralyzed physically, Ben and Trevor hit the road on a trip into the western states. The folks they collect along the way will help them test their skills for surviving outside their calculated existence. Together, they come to understand the importance of hope and the necessity of true friendship.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Netflix

Director

Producted By

Levantine Entertainment

Trailers & Images

Reviews

banjax-1 Lots of talent (bar the ludicrous Selena Gomez in a career-killing performance) but absolutely no inspiration. A clueless drama that trots out every awful cliché imaginable and is utterly predictable at every dreadful turn.
shopndeals We just watched this on Netflix. It was so well done. We laughed and cried. The acting is superb. Watch this one!
Kapten Video A writer (Paul Rudd) retires after a great personal tragedy and becomes a disabled teen's (Craig Roberts) caregiver. When the two embark on an road trip, both of their abilities to cope with the real world is put under a test. Also appearing: Julia Denton, Jennifer Ehle, Selena Gomez et al. There's something enduringly endearing about Paul Rudd. He's only an OK actor, and he does way too many bland and generic comedies… but I still find him cool and want to see most everything he shows up in. This is actually one the better ones. It's not really good, per se... but at least one of the less bland and generic ones. Based on a novel by Jonathan Evison, written and directed by Rob Burnett, produced as a Netflix original, it's a bittersweet comedy about not being a pussy and trying to live every once in a while. It has a heart in right place but looking back, I'd like to criticize more than applaud the result. Writer-director Burnett has tried definitely too hard creating an authentic and hip story to really get away with it. it would probably help if two of the three main female characters were more realistic or at least more compatible with the general tone, not as exaggerated and shallow as they are now. Also, Burnett seems to be much better at adding the story lines than working with them, so most of the stuff brought in gets carelessly thrown overboard at some point without proper development or closure. Well, at least the central story of taking a road trip gets enough attention. Rudd is charming as usual, but he doesn't quite have all the range needed for playing this character. He's fine most of the time because he speaks little and acting grumpy is easy, but all in all, it's easy to notice a certain lack of depth to his acting. Wish they used somebody more diverse actor for that role. The best thing here is Craig Roberts giving a quirky, deadpan performane as foul-mouthed disabled teen. Roberts is probably still best known for his breakthrough role in 2010's „Submarine", but this is certainly a good follow-up. I kind of felt him channeling young Edward Norton and young Joseph Gordon- Levitt, which is a good company to hang out in. "Fundamentals" is quite OK but it doesn't really hold together well, if you begin to think about it. But... there's still Rudd!
Harhaluulo54 This movie starts off with our special-needs-bad-attitude kid asking the question "how would you wipe my ***." And it ends me saying "well, I would take this movie's cover picture, wipe your *** with it and then put it in your mouth. So my question to you is, 'did the sh*t ever leave the ***hole?'" The philosophical / life questions this movie raises are all sh*t. I don't mean this as an insult. I mean literally every time the characters say something "smart" it is always somehow tied to sh*t, *** or ***holes. Few times to pen**. It goes down your throat in such extend that at some point you start to wish you were watching South Park episode about "The Poo That Took a Pee" just to how less genital / urea related content in your TV. I already early on, after the first ***-related comparison - decided I would not like this movie. As the story advanced, I only came to once again realize that movies can -indeed- be judged in the first minutes. The story felt like a try- hard version of Untouchable without delivering anything except bitterness and bad attitude. More suitable name for this title is The Fukk-a-mentality of Swearing, just because they swear and talk sh*t so much that you find yourself doing the same. I have been temporarily corrupted by this.... sh*t. All in all I can't recommend this movie to anyone else except to those who think swearing is cool or have illogical obsession about ***holes. I mean, who needs thought-provoking, witty or sarcasm when you can just use the worlds ***, f*** and sh*t in so many different orders that it would surprise you. Insert few pen**es so the jokes won't fall SHORT. Nope, still not funny.** I had to censor down a lot of the words because IMDb won't allow me to use the same swear words this movie is filled with. How sad is that. **