binapiraeus I don't even think you've got to be a Philo Vance fan or a classic mystery buff to be utterly disappointed by this movie; but if you've seen other Philo Vance movies beforehand, this one will surely make you wonder WHO on earth had the idea to try and combine one of his cases with a Gracie Allen comedy.I usually try and put myself in the place of the audience of the time to find out why a movie that doesn't appeal to me at all today was popular then - but in this case, that's not even necessary, because even then it was a flop; and that's no wonder.Gracie Allen was a very popular radio comedy star together with her husband George Burns; and their domestic little jokes obviously appealed to quite a lot of fans who weren't too hard to please. I've got some of their broadcasts on cassette, and it's - well, just VERY light comedy, much lighter than, for example, W.C. Fields, Bergen & McCarthy, or even Abbott and Costello. But it was comedy, and it was popular.The 'Philo Vance' movie series, on the other hand, which had started 10 years before this movie was made, was composed of classic murder mysteries, with suspense, clever plots - and humor; Philo Vance's OWN kind of dry, slightly sarcastic gentleman's humor. That was just about enough humor those films needed to lighten up the atmosphere of crime and murder a little bit, and it was intelligent and well-dosed and in a way quite charming. And then, since the success of the long-running film series seemed to fade a little, the producers seemed to try a NEW feature that would radically alter the style, and (hence the title) lure more people into the theaters with the big name of Gracie Allen.But what was the result? Unsuspecting Gracie Allen fans were probably scared by the murder plot, the strangers lurking in dark apartments, the poisoned flowers and cigarettes (which they only described as smelling like 'bitter almond', not even bothering to mention that this, as everybody who has read or watched more than two or three murder mysteries, means of course cyanide, or prussic acid...) - while Philo Vance fans must have simply gone MAD with rage at this nut case who doesn't stop talking nonsense for a single moment, until they probably wished somebody would at last murder HER...Don't get me wrong, I LOVE crime comedies, from "Arsenic and Old Lace" to "Murder by Death" to "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" - but all those WERE real crime comedies, parodies on the genre without losing the grip on the suspense and the atmosphere of the genre itself. They don't try to mix PURE comedy with PURE mystery, like "The Gracie Allen Murder Case" did - but the outcome is neither a comedy nor a mystery; and it's CERTAINLY not recommended for serious fans of serious classic murder mysteries.

gridoon2018 There are two ways to approach this movie. If you take it as a mystery, and a chapter of the "Philo Vance" series, it's only OK and rather sketchy. But if you take it as a comedy, it works much better. Gracie Allen is a great comedienne. I wouldn't exactly classify her character as "dumb"; she simply has her own stream-of-consciousness "logic" about everything, which baffles everyone around her. She has a lot of very funny lines here ("Were you ever a Girl Scout, Bill?" - "What would I do with a bunch of girls?" - "Well, if you don't know, I'm not gonna tell you!"), and a few bits of equally funny physical comedy: the highlight may be the scene where she imitates Philo's mannerisms as he's looking around a room for clues (the final gag of the film goes on too long, though). And there is an underlying sweetness about her that just puts a smile on your face. It's a pity her only other experiment with the mystery-comedy genre, "Mr. And Mrs. North", is so hard to find today. **1/2 out of 4.

writtenbymkm-583-902097 Other reviewers on this site have contributed excellent histories and background, so I'll simply add this: Burns and Allen are funny, Gracie Allen without Burns may be funny if you like her brand of "dumb humor," but Gracie ruined this movie for me. There was a mostly acceptable plot, some very good supporting actors (especially Donald MacBride and William Demarest), but forcing Gracie Allen's constant scatterbrained chatter onto the characters and events of an actual mystery was just, well, painful. I kept wanting to shout at her (as some of the other characters in the movie did) to just shut up and go away. Bottom line, if you want to watch Gracie destroy a decent whodunit, go for it -- otherwise, forget it. And by the way, there's a really amazingly unfunny "physical comedy" bit at the end, totally unrelated to the movie or anything else, that's embarrassingly awful.

Norm-30 I've always loved the scatter-brained comedy of Gracie Allen, but she is terribly out of place in this (so-called) "mystery". Don't get me wrong -- she's EXCELLENT but, unfortunately, "overwhelms" the film, and the mystery is lost in the shuffle. Warren William (as Philo) is pitifully wasted in this film.A better title for this film should be, "What Happened to Philo Vance"?