bporter-19098 Great storyline, but you literally can't see anything. They made everything so dark that you have no clue what's going on half the time because you can't see.

christmaspikachu Whilst not being as good as the first Woman In Black film, it wasn't too bad overall. The tension was well built and the scares weren't too bad. The only thing that put me off was some of the cheesy acting. But, I've seen much worse!

Kirpianuscus it is a correct horror. and a not bad sequel. it not gives more surprises but preserves the original atmosphere, gives decent story and good performances, reminds old fashion horror rules. and this is a virtue in the middle of films of genre reduced at blood and cries. in same measure, a good point is represented by the war atmosphere who gives a special nuance to the story. short, a good film. for the grace to use different ingredients - the love story, the dark rooms, the pressure to the teachers to protect the children, the effort to save and the hope force. a film like an old picture, more then the first film. because it gives many opportunities to explore the sides of a revenge myth. because it has the almost ignored virtues of the classic horror. and this is real a good thing.

krycek19 I honestly gave up watching this crap after 47 minutes with nothing happening, except one death and only a glimpse of the lady in black. The death is not even shown, nor explained. They just find the body of one of the boys on the beach no way near the house.I really don't get how they could muck this up so bad. The original was truly terrifying and one of the best horror movies in many years.But apart from the title and the same house, this is so boring that it doesn't even deserve to be labeled horror.As a drama it doesn't work either. The characters are two-dimensional and I don't really care when when the first boy dies.The original worked both as a drama and as a horror-movie with sympathetic likable characters.This movie has none of that in spite of having what appears to be a larger budget than the original, it comes off as a cheaper movie.People who actually like this and considers it better than the original are the usual morons that wouldn't know a good movie if it came up and bit them in the ass.The same people that consider The Dark Knight Rises, MI:4, Shutter Island, Miami Vice and Skyfall good movies. 5 of the worst movies ever made. Do not take their opinions seriously as they're completely clueless.Everyone is of course entitled to their opinion, but being a person that love movies and have actual knowledge of movies, actors, directors, genres e.t.c. I consider my opinion more trustworthy than people who love crappy movies over good movies and who has no demands of any kind when they judge a movie.