mcgaha-94387 I am gobsmacked at the idea that this film actually made its way to any screen, let alone mine. From as early as the title, I knew not to expect much. I was wrong. This film delivered. And what it delivered is a stunning example of film-making so fantastically bad that, ninety minutes earlier, I wouldn't have thought it possible.within the unmitigated failure of this project, it would seem that they threw lines of dialog on a page and then counted on the CGI to carry the rest. Unfortunately, the CGI in this film is close, but not as good as when I learned to use the numbers on my pocket calculator to spell out "BOOBS".Filmed half in a dank basement, the rest was filmed on the Queen Mary, using tilting cameras to pronounce the ever increasing, yet entirely inconsistent list of this most fictional of ships (it's a shame the extras weren't told which way to lean). The CGI effects enveloped what remained, and to the credit of the makers, it was too dark to really see anything at all. For that, I'm eternally grateful.There are precious moments to be cherished. One which comes to mind was when the protagonist and her young Richard Branson-ish love interest are stymied by an errant extension cord poised over a dollop of sea-water. Or better, when a helicopter carrying the well-meaning scientist is confronted by an impossibly tall wave and must climb in order to avoid being swallowed whole. The pilot is seen to cry out, "Pull up!! I repeat - pull up!!", and then sure enough, he pulls back on the stick, leaving us to wonder, "who the hell was he taking to?" There is a place for films like these. No, no, I don't mean in theaters - God no. Films like these are an inspiration to the rest of us, giving a very clear assurance that indeed we really could do a better job, even with sock-puppets and a cardboard box. Otherwise, films like these are a simple and special form of entertainment for those times when the bottle is nearly empty and you can't see much anyway.

mollie-tillett I don't even know why they would do a second Titanic..it amazes me how they think this'll make any money or profit in the box office. This film got a hype review before it had of even come out, it got people all hyped up..and turned out to have shocking results and poor reviews. If you are thinking of buying this film...don't bother, you are wasting 1-2 hours of your life..plus another downside is (and you know if its a good film or not) that there were no options for subtitles...the majority of films that are produced should have subtitles as an option and also audio description should be another option.I am very disappointed but no one can reproduce a film like David Cameron and have Kate and Leo being the main protagonists.

Ironpipes1-202-903609 I'm torn. If this was meant to be a spoof or a sublime comedy, than my rating would be an 8 or 9. As a serious movie - this has got to be one of the worst constructed movies in history. Acting, script, plot, dialogue, sets, effects, soundtrack - you name it - is just abhorrent. Utter ridiculousness. There is no possible way someone signed off on this and thought it would work as a drama. It has to be a joke. It just has to. No sane industry executive would dare put there name on this otherwise. If it indeed was meant as a comedy - then - hats off. It's hilarious. And you have my apologies. Watch it as a comedy and have a good laugh, watch it as a drama and you'll be hard pressed to make it to the end credits.

allen-70038 I"m watching it right now on TV (subtitled into Spanish no less) ... the real titanic movie cost $200 million, this one had a budget of 1/2 a million ... if you watch the movie with the frame of mind that it will be one of the cheesiest and most ridiculous movies you will ever see ... than you might actually get a kick out of watching it and laughing at the ridiculous scenes ... that way it won't be painful to watch. it reeks of low budget at pretty much every scene ... some of the computer graphics are really low quality ... you just can't take this movie seriously!