heath-jeffrey I think this movie needs two grades, one for hardcore rock/metal fans who are ALSO into mixed-martial arts (MMA) and/or the ultimate fighting championship (UFC), and one for a more general audience. My review's for the latter:'Low budget' says it for the obvious: poor special effects, poor quality audio and video, etc.But sadly (considering I wish we, Australia, would have more success with movies), it's equally as bad when it comes to the rest: * very weak acting for the most part * poor casting (the main actor looks inherently happy and easygoing, but he's playing an enraged vigilante seeking revenge for a heinous crime) * and the plot is (a) fairly simple/straightforward, (b) a copy of plots used in numerous other movies, (c) no improvement on the plots it's copying

jgrayson_au I'm not sure who the people giving this 8 and 9 are, but they didn't watch the same movie I did. So, what can you expect.The acting is B grade (or lower). The sound is terrible (I think every punch in the movie has the same sound). Colour is off. The writing is poor and unbelievable. But, worst of all, the plot sucks.And that's really the most important thing in a low budget movie. You can put up with bad acting or bad sound, as long as the story is something fresh and new. That's how Mad Max and Saw came about (and to a lesser extent, Paranormal Activity and Blair Witch).But Vigilante's plot is almost a carbon copy of The Punisher, and even then it's not original.If you happen to live in Qld (Gold Coast) you might find a redeeming feature by seeing 'your town' on the screen, but for most people, just watch the Thomas Jane / John Travolta version of The Punisher (which in itself is flawed, but much better).

hellspawn75 Vigilante is a B Grade action film. There's Just no getting around it. However, don't let that little fact make you think the film is total crap. There are failings- a lot of them, but there are also some genuine great moments of potential. The story is the typical revenge flick, Nothing different from Charles Bronson in the mid 70's and nearly every action film from the 80's. What Keeps Vigilante from reaching it's potential are two things: It's lead actor, and script. Robert Diaz, Who plays Luke, the titular Vigilante, Has all the screen presence, charisma and acting ability of a puddle of puke on a hot day. Now, were Diaz any other character, this'd be pretty bad, but as the lead? The guy we are supposed to empathize with and cheer in his righteous crusade to justice? This is unforgivable. He's flat, lifeless and Moves with all the grace of a spastic giraffe in the fight scenes. Robert: A little more emoting, a little less chest puffing, please. As far as the script, You can't help but feel that it's sort of a PG version of more hard edged film. The sort of violence you'd expect to see in a film of this sort is all but gone. The Rape and murder of Luke's girlfriend happens entirely off camera, as does the beating Luke suffers at the hands of the thugs. This gives the film two big problems.one, you just don't care enough about Luke, Not in the way you care for the hero in films like Death Wish, Death Sentence, The Punisher,Mad Max etc, and two, you don't really get a sense of how vile the Bad Guys are. Had we seen, even in flashes,the horror the couple had gone through, you might be cheering for Lukes character, despite Diaz's constant posturing. Other Stumbling blocks Vigilante faces on the story side are the almost Mr Miyagi meets fight club training Luke receives at the hands of the hospital attendant/ ninja master, The Kid who randomly pops up at the hospital as Luke recovers to tell him he should be Batman, The Burning 'V' at the start of the film (Very, very groan worthy). Also, Luke seems to have no purpose when he does hit the streets- rather than focusing on taking out the men who ruined his life, he seems content to randomly bash muggers and drug dealers until he gets his act together. If this was meant to be seen as Luke honing his skills before going up against the big dogs, Sorry, it just wasen't clear.The other issue facing Vigilante is that the whole film feels like it happens over a week. It's only at the end that Alex's dialogue reveals that it's been years since Luke was attacked. It feels like there's at least half an hour missing from the film that might give a sense of time passing.BUT! As I said, it's not all bad. Acting as a brilliant counterweight to the Beige Glory that is Robert Diaz' bargin basement Bruce Wayne are the Villains: Otherwise known as the best thing about the whole film. Kazuya Wright brings more depth and likability to Alex Devero in a few minutes than Diaz gives us in an hour. Wright fills Alex full of a healthy dose of both Psychosis and Self Loathing, and owns the screen whenever he's on it, Without taking it over.Wright's breakdown scenes , both in the bathroom and after the murder of his father are the finest moments of acting in this film. The Comradarie Of the Three Main Villains is superb. Ozzie Devrish as Jack and Christian Radford as Mako are the perfect counter parts to Wrights psychotic Alex, Deverish as the older mentor struggling to keep Alex in line and Radford as the sadistic young upstart gleefully egging Alex's insanity on. Honestly, The Wealth of Material hinted at in the writing and performance of these three characters means you could easily lose Diaz' foppish Luke, focus the film on these three and have a genuinely brilliant Film.From Alex's father issues, to Deverish's weariness , to Radford's puppy like worship of Alex, these three make the film, And you sorely begin to wish all three were explored more. Here you have three clearly talented actors who command the screen and hold your interest. Not to mention the physicality they bring to the parts- you BELIEVE these guys are tough, which is something Diaz failed to convey. Of course, as great as these guys performances are- and they really are- it's yet another area in that painfully draws the spotlight on how god-awful Robert Diaz's portrayal of Luke is- Here you have , essentially, a revenge film where you cheer for the Villains more than the hero. The other nice moments are the fight scenes, in which Wright an Radford handle themselves with exceptional realism, to such a degree that it's not believable that Diaz's Luke could ever hope to get the better of either of them. All in All, despite the faults, Vigilante is an entertaining enough b-grade actioner that falls short of being a solid film and desperately aches for a better leading man, but is still worth a watch.

M. Douglas Me and a pal came across this movie while looking for some old style action flicks. And while it does provide some good action and fights, ultimately it's let down by the lead actors wooden performance.It's your standed revenge type flick that sees the hero's life "Luke" destroyed by 3 wannabe tough guys in a senseless violent act. This sets him on a path of self destruction and redemption that has been done before and a lot better too.The lead actress and actors performance where dull, lifeless and unbelievable. Only once did we ever believe him throughout the flick. We both found it hard to sympathize or care about the guy and could care less about his journey. I suspect this has to do with not only his acting but the direction and editing too.Where this flick really shines is in the supporting cast. The 3 tough wannabe crims were all fabulously brought to life and every time they came back on screen the atmosphere picked up.It was these guys that we both found interesting and wanted to watch. Funny, angry and a tad crazy the bad guy "Alex" was a stand out. We both related to him as he had issues with his father that i think most could follow. Though i really felt sorry for his 2 pals that had to follow him around.Over all the movie was a tad disjointed but watchable only for the bad guys and their hilarious attitudes. An average movie made better by these three stooges.MD