xposipx Two young entrepreneurs open up a voyeuristic Internet site. One by one the models are being killed off. Reason? None.In a generic slasher like this there needs to be some entertaining kills and a decent amount of blood. The movie opens up with a throat stabbing that's pretty bloody and promising, but after that all of the kills are exactly the same and not graphic at all. There's 3 stomach stabbings, 3 throats slit, and a LAME decapitation. Every single kill is exactly the same.There's a constant voice over through the entire movie that gives away who the killer is. It's done extremely poorly. The audio is muffled and they kicked in cheesy rock music every time there was about to be some nudity. I felt like I was watching a soft core Playboy video half of the time. I'm still not ever sure what I just watched.As far as acting goes, Jena Romano really wasn't so bad as the shy main character. Other than that, most everyone was on the same acting level. Two of the other girls in the house were completely terrible, but the script was awful...so I guess it was just a combination. It would be a waste of time to talk about any actors though...they will never be in another movie.Final Thoughts: I don't know what in the hell I just watched. Soft core porn, bad acting, lame kills, NO PLOT WHATSOEVER, and ripping off Scream is not the way to go about making a good movie. The opening scene was such a blatant ripoff of Scream it wasn't even funny. The phone call with the voice and the questions... lame. The killer even used a similar voice changer. The one thing I learned from this movie is that washed up 30 year old women like to blow bubbles and strip together. What a pile of crap.

dirtyfrank16 Let me start this off by saying when i rented this movie i knew it was going to be terrible. You see me and my friends have a hobby of renting the most ridiculous horror movie we can find, because they are usually funnier than conventional comedies. But believe me, when we rented this we got way more than we bargained for.Voyuer.com is bad in all the standard ways; acting the quality of a 3rd grade play, dialog seemingly written by either a porn director or a monkey with bottle of vodka and a typewriter, blood substitutes ranging from strawberry kool-aid to motor oil (yep, i said motor oil),camera work similar to my drunk uncles home movies. I could go on but it would be monotonous. If you've seen any of these movies then you know all the normal things that turn an awful movie into a mind-numbingly awful movie.But what makes this movie stand out is the fact that the filmmakers truly innovated in the category of terrible. They did this by almost completely disregarding any kind of continuity and assuming that the majority of the people watching the movie would have been just punched the the eye and would have an eye patch over the other.Early in the movie it becomes clear that none of the actresses playing the main roles were willing to expose themselves. As a solution to this problem the "filmmakers" found one woman who was willing to get naked and just used shots of her when any of the other characters were supposed to be nude. This leaves even the most un-observant viewers with questions like,"What happened to her nail polish?" or "Wasn't she just a lot tanner?" or "Didn't she just have nipple rings?" My personal favorite moment is the unintentional reference to Monty Python. This happens when the killer is shown running down the same hallway upwards of 15 times.To sum this up, I will just say that as a person who has an appreciation for cinema, I was appalled. If you have two working eyes or a fully functional brain STAY AWAY FROM THIS MOVIE.

Dr. Gore *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* Oh man, what a letdown. This should have been an easy slam dunk. Any video box that promises, "…nine luscious ladies romping together in a house, while 20 video cameras capture their every move…" gets my vote. Surely something worthwhile should happen when you log onto "Voyeur.com". Bad news. Their website needs a lot of work.So nine luscious ladies check into a house run by two horny dot-com entrepreneurs. They want the women to do something interesting so that they can make some dough. So what's missing from this picture? How about doing something interesting? A masked killer shows up to slice and dice the women but no one really cares until the very end."Voyeur.com" is shot on super cheap video and it looks even cheaper. Its ultra low budget eventually betrays it as it becomes apparent that the filmmakers couldn't afford any nudity from their stars. All of the naked breast shots are from some random girl and they're all from the neck down. They used the same body double for almost every scene. How lame is that? I thought these girls were supposed to be exhibitionists. Where's the exhibition? It's on a different website.You can forget about the horror scenes saving this one. All we have here is fully clothed wild girls getting their throats slit by some loser in a black overcoat. "Voyeur.com" had a great concept but the actual movie couldn't live up to its high sleaze potential.

SCoRN [UK] Typing in the real director's name, Miles Feldman revealed only a couple of movies & Voyeur.Com wasn't one of them. Here in the UK This terrible home made movie goes by the name of BigBrother.Com, no doubt to cash in on the "real" Big Brother show. AND they stock it at Blockbuster video too. Shame on them! Shame on everyone involved in this heap of S**t too! If anything, the film previewed a movie called Camp Blood (also stocked at Blockbuster) & so I'm kinda greatful in a way cause now I've been saved £3. So wots the movie about? Three lads invite a bunch of teenage bimbos over to a house equipped with webcams. Queue the odd shower, pee scene, & lots of brainless banter. Some stalker comes along & bumps everyone off with a knife. That's it. Only because it's a homemade movie, they couldn't afford any make up fx. This garbage gives "proper" slasher movies (Slumber 3, Sorority house et all) a really bad name - & if you hated those, blimey what will you make of this? 1 outta 10!