Lars Lendale ***************** SPOILERS **************If you're 14 years old and you've never seen a softcore porn movie on your own before, then that might be the only exception to this condition for liking this movie.That movie is a copy of the first one, yet it manages to be boring and mediocre. Same plot twists, same concept, same town, same school. How can they do that in the same school ? !A ton of plot holes, a ton of events that are not possible - such as Britney not getting caught, who's in charge of laundering the money ? Because it's only a company check, so who's in charge of wiring the money to an account ? Hw can Britney use this money if the company check is signed to Maya ? How can Britney pay off a tenant of a aerodrome without any money on her account ? How can the police not investigate on the missing Julian Hayes ? How can the police not check that Britney checked out exactly at the same aerodrome Niles crashed the plane ? How can Bridge come to the conclusion that the girls murdered Hayes ? How can Britney have nightmares of her mother's suicide when she is actually still alive ? A sequel as uninspired as this, is unacceptable. The cast is a TV second tier actors, the girls are hot but they hardly ever show much of their bodies, the sex scenes are laughable with doubles, a real rip offs. Seriously this is 2004 and you come up with the exact same erotic scene ? Wow, a real rip-offs, a few kisses here and there, a guy in his boxer shorts, what is this ? The only performance worth mentioning is Washington. Other than that, very forgettable movie.

disdressed12 this followup to the original Wildthings falls short in a lot of ares.it is nearly a carbon copy of the original plot structure.basically people betraying each other and being betrayed by others.however,there is no originality in this movie.the basic story has been done and much effectively in the original.there are a lot of twists and turns in this one,but they are very predictable,although ridiculous at time.the acting,while decent in the original,is less than decent in this movie.this is unfortunate,because the story itself is not good enough to carry the movie.you may find your eyelids drooping while watching this thing,as it is painfully slow at times.and you're eyes will glaze over and roll back in your head at the absurdity of the plot twists.i believe many of these plot twists were simply added to keep the movie at a certain running time.this movie is a much less than average effort 3* out of 10

drmilo-1 It's almost all been said about this dreck already except one thing. Yes I've found a new complaint for this rubbish! Apparently the people creating this movie have no idea how wealth should look, or they thought their audience would be fooled, or perhaps they thought that everything else in this (Did I mention this movie isn't worth downloading for nothing?) awful flick was so bad nobody would find the time to complain about what I'm going to complain about! Whatever. The limousine the supposedly wealthy girl rides in would have been old in 1990! The, rather small, home she lives in is devoid of decent furniture or art (Oh but it has a plain and cheap looking wine cellar, she must be rich!). The clothes Ms. Ward wears could be obtained easily at Sears.It has been said already that this drivelfest fails to get even the easy stuff right and this is yet another example.Pity I can't give it a 0.

preppy-3 Rich high school girl Britney Harvers (Susan Ward) has a dead mother she misses and a lousy stepfather who hates her. He dies in a plane crash and she's left all his millions. But cruel, obnoxious school girl Maya King (Leila Arcieri) claims Britney's stepfather was HER father and she deserves all the money...Pointless "sequel" to "Wild Things". It's basically the same exact plot with a few (minor) twists and turns....just done with a bad cast and a terrible script. If you've seen the first you don't need to see this--you already have. It even copies the infamous threesome sex scene from the original! (Trust me--the original is better). This is just made to show young, attractive women in bikinis--wet ones preferably.I'm giving this a 2 because it has some good points. Everybody looks good (Ward and Arceri are beautiful and Joe Michael Burke has a nice body); the settings themselves are lush; there's one good performance by Isiah Washington and a nice score. But you're constantly one step ahead of this movie and it gets annoying. See the original--you'll be much better off.