Strike

2017
Strike

Seasons & Episodes

  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

EP1 Episode 1 Dec 11, 2022

Strike is approached by a woman asking for help to find her mother, Margot Bamborough, who went missing in 1974 when a psychopathic serial killer stalked the streets.

EP2 Episode 2 Dec 12, 2022

The investigation takes a dangerous turn as a disturbing piece of evidence leads Robin and Strike into London’s underworld. Robin risks her life by pursuing a vicious suspect.

EP3 Episode 3 Dec 18, 2022

Spurred on by the father of a young woman who also went missing in the 1970s, the detectives attempt to outwit an incarcerated serial killer who may hold the key to the case.

EP4 Episode 4 Dec 19, 2022

Strike realises that Margot’s killer is responsible for many other murders that have gone undetected, and lays a trap.
7.9| 0h30m| TV-MA| en| More Info
Released: 27 August 2017 Returning Series
Producted By: Brontë Film and Television
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b093ypxy
Synopsis

A war veteran turned private detective operates out of a tiny office in London’s Denmark Street. Although wounded both physically and psychologically, his unique insight and background as a military police investigator prove crucial in solving complex crimes that have baffled the police. Based on the bestselling novels written by J.K. Rowling under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Brontë Film and Television

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Patchista I wish the producers had made this into a mini series and given the secondary characters more to do (they are wonderfully written in the book). There is certainly enough of a story there. Still, the two main actors are portrayed well and really embody their characters.
Charles Herold (cherold) As a fan of the Cormoran Strike books, I looked forward to seeing them brought to life. But ultimately I felt like they were only half brought to life.It's hard to say what it is, exactly. I thought the leads were well cast. The first episode has a very stylish, intriguing intro. But the series just lacks personality. I watched all from the first book and found it nothing but watchable. The first book's strength was its more realistic portrayal of detective work as painstaking and detail oriented, but that is, unsurprisingly, flattened out in the adaptation. While the first series left me cold, I still watched the first episode of the second season, which comes from my favorite book in the series Once again, I just found it difficult to keep interested. I decided I would stop there.While perfectly watchable and fairly true to the series, it all just lacks something. I was never pulled into the characters lives or into the mysteries.
davehaydock The balance of not to gory but not to miss daisy...great characters who grow on you....really good bbc tv at its best...love tv series that have ends...so fed up of american series that that do ends that are ambiguous ..so they can make new series if popular
carolratedr I haven't read the book,but all I can say is that if you are a true fan of crime novels,and murder mysteries, you will find this story extremely trite,and disappointing. The characters are extremely basic, there is no motivation or purpose behind these one dimensional people,and it was simply a " murder by numbers" story. It was so basic, so uninteresting,and I guessed at who the killer was at the very start of the show, only as a joke,and was severely disappointed when it turned out to be that person. By this person being the killer made the whole story redundant and ridiculous. There was no,logical reasoning behind the murder,and there was no logical, motive, nor was there any kind of logical sequence of actual police work or credibility to the investigation.There was no real intrigue, nor suspense. I have seen better investigations in games of cluedo.I found it all to be amateur,and if her publisher hadn't accidentally on purpose leaked that it was jk Rowling who wrote it, not a single copy of this book would be sold,and Would never had been considered for being turned into a movie. The only redeeming factor I would say was they actually gave a realistic view of London,and it wasn't glamorized.It's an extremely basic book,basic story, could have been written by a teenager . It was extremely tedious , dull and anticlimactic. It was almost as though she didn't know what to do with her own story and hurriedly decided to make the character into a killer , last minute. I guess she got use to lazy writing, like she did in the last Harry Potter book,so thought it would work here. Ah well she is famous, so she could wipe snot on a piece of paper and people would pay through the nose for it.