Maharishi verma Shivangi and Veer are happily living in London. But after receiving a parcel from India, Veer is possessed by a witch. So,Shivangi returns to India to seek help from Jai sing an exorcist. The story has nothing new to offer but the twist before the second half is interesting which do not last for long.Songs are good .Performance wise Sharman Joshi is impressive. But, the problem with this film is that the screenplay had been poorly written.And there are no scary scenes in this flick which can make you scream.However, the climax is the only nice part of this film which do not let you down. Though the VFX are good but not scary,background score could've been better.There is also a good thing about this film that it does not bore.Honestly, I'm saying that this is the only film in the 1920 series which I like.Vikram sir, if you had worked on script a little more it could've been a good horror film. "Wait for another film in series", is my advice to the horror fans.

kinshuk-gaur I am found of Horror movies and wait eagerly to watch specifically if it is a Hindi Movie.After Ramsay brand of Horror Vikram Bhatt and Ramgopal Verma are holding the flag. 1920 London comes from successful 1920 franchise. But this movie disappoints, though the promos and the story looked promising.Lets talk about the movie. When will Vikram Bhatt stop follow the routine that he is depicting in all earlier ventures. Though he is not the director but writer of the movie. For ages we have seen a mistress named as KESAR Maa... it seems like his lucky mascot. Copy the scenes of " The Excorsit " in almost every so called Horror movie. Try too catch ghost through a mirror this is the 3rd movie i remember that follows the same pathThe problem of this movie is its half baked plot, lack of continuity of scenes. Very Bad CGI ...No scary scene at all wonder why this is called a Horror movie...Direction is poor the director needs to work very hard as some scenes in the movie which are supposed to be scary turns out as comicalActing.. Sharman tries hard but fails his look in the movie no where resembles to a poor Tantrik baba ( He looks like a model in a designer outfit)... Meera Chopra pleasssse can you learn acting though not her but the director's fault because he cast ed her... Rest is forgettable...Cheers! to some of the Ramsay fans who might watch this, movie features some of the Ramsay's regular who show screen presence for 1 to 2 minutes and then disappear ... Surendra Pal, Gajendra Chauhan, Siraj Mustafa, Arun Bali , Sushmita Mukherjee...The Climax of the movie is comical... Music is Bad.. Background music is also average. though Cinematography is goodOverall this is half baked movie and if you watch this will leave you in bad taste..Vikram Bhatt please reinvent your horror or it is the time again when ... We want the Ramsay.. Horror Back

Fella_shibby The poster itself is a rip off of the movie, the possession of Michael king. Audiences including my kids were laughing in the theatre. When big studios hav started making horror flicks like Insidious, Annabelle, The Unborn, The rite, Conjuring, etc. there is no chance of cheesy Hindi horror flicks like these. Anyways I gave a 6 jus for the effort. But some of the scenes were total rip off. Like the scene where the possessed person walks on both legs n hands (the unborn). Even the scene where the spirit enters the body while the person is lying on the bed (cannot recall the name). The mirror thing is getting monotonous. The concept of another world in the mirror is getting stale. The only movie which pulled off the mirror/another world concept was a segment from the movie VHS 2. Another rip off is the one when the images from the photos scream. The black eyes n sealed lips r too getting monotonous. I always wonder, y a possessed person has to do hyperextension of their joints. The movie has nothing new to offer. Worst were the cgi effects. The scene where Sharman n his girlfriend standing in a desert in the middle of nowhere. Too ridiculous man. Even one of my fav scene from one of my fav movie, The Shrine (the statue scene) was badly incorporated in this. The makers of this flick shud watch small budget horror flicks (indie horror) from Hollywood.

pinchpot And speaks mandarin Chinese. Makes much more sense. I guess I am trying to figure out exactly what the hell this is supposed to be.Seriously? This is an all Indian film, composed of all Indian actors, and it is called 1920 London. Obviously very accurate.Yet conversely people go totally ballistic when Dragon Ball Z and Ghost In A Shell star non Asian actors...and rightly so. This is a stupid concept. In 1920 London was not inhabited entirely of Indian people, strangely enough. Maybe the fact that the English love curry threw you off? Understandable. But still a stupid concept.Cant wait to see roots remade with an all Mexican cast. Or The Muhammad Ali story starring Seth Rogen and Lucy Liu.Anyway, that's my take. Enjoy!