damnnative I saw a cool-looking cover with "666" and "supernatural powers" on it so I expected darkness and cool demons but it was definitely not that.After 10 to 15 minutes I realized I was mistaken. The awkward length of semi-naked man scenes revealed to me that this is some kind of b-grade homoerotic soft porn garbage with terrible acting and poor sound quality.10/10 NOPES!

jaimedance3 Don't Waste Your Time On This Film With Horrible Acting ~ And if You Waste Your Time Watching A Guy Take A Shower For 5 Min or A Guy Exercising For 5 Min. Both Shirtless With Scary Music In The Back Ground And Nothing Happening ~ A Total Waste Of Anyone's Time To Even Sit Thru This Film Two Thumbs Down.

Leofwine_draca 666: KREEPY KERRY is another slice of softcore nonsense from B-movie director David DeCoteau. A real film it isn't. The story sees a bunch of the usual young and buff characters being assailed by a telepath which causes them to have psychic orgasms. The whole film is an odyssey of rubbing, caressing and self-gratification, with negligible plotting and terrible acting everywhere you look. It's good if you like tight white underwear, junk if you don't.

Andy Khaos I actually signed up just to write this to warn others, life is too short to waste it watching movies like this, the acting was atrocious, I've seen better on television adverts, also at one point I thought i had fallen asleep and woke up watching a gay porn channel, the cameraman seemed very obsessed with the young naked male torsos and a lot of scenes were drawn out and unnecessary IMO, I was almost as if the director just thought "hey I'll get some young fit guys together and make them rub themselves, if you are foolhardy enough to watch it you will see what I mean....the $1m budget was probably spent on hiring the house, because actors that bad do not deserve to be paid, the movie is 75 minutes, well that is time i will never get back