dbblazter After that 70's show she really made some good film choices. This one is kinda iffy. Especially when billed as "Part 2" you sorta expect something similar to the original, not slap stick comedy. But is is a decent comedy, just don'e expect ANYTHING like the original. Because you will be disappointed. How the writers came up with this using the title of the movie is confusing. It's a light, snarky teen comedy. Not the dark suspense of the original. But to each their own. I just thought viewers needed to know what they are getting into because AP was a great disturbing film. That fulfilled it's title well. This one is a little deceiving, but seeing Kunis AND SHATNER in the credits would make most figure it can't be ANYTHING like the original. Their careers are not drawn down that dark path

adonis98-743-186503 A girl named Rachael Newman has developed a taste for murder and will stand at nothing to become a college professor's assistant. American Psycho II: All American Girl is an awful sequel from start to finish if anyone ever thought that maybe everything was in Bateman's head well in this movie Bateman gets killed by Rachael when she was younger and she goes insane as well and kills some people and the fact that they used Mila Kunis is one of the least problems that this movie has it's dumb, it's a joke next to the first film and for some reason William Shatner is in this movie too for some reason the film also ends like every horror film does this days which is that the evil escapes and changes a name or something like that i'm going to give American Psycho 2 a 3/10.

BigMe03 If this movie had been made as just another crime/thriller movie and not as a sequel to American Psycho, I honestly think it would have been slightly more successful; the reason being is that those who have seen the first movie will have high expectations of this one (unless they have viewed this IMDb page) and be making comparisons throughout the 90 minute duration. As a sequel to a highly successful thriller movie, this movie falls far short of the mark; even as a thriller this movie still falls short. Both the story and the characters are highly undeveloped, which makes the movie unbelievable. In comparison to the first film it is nowhere near as graphic, which contributes to the unbelievable story and makes the film less sadistic. Parts of the dialogue are laughable but not in a black comedy way like the first one. One of the biggest problems I had with the film is that nobody noticed when someone was killed, there was no police investigation, no panic from the community and this is where the movie again tries to use the same elements that made the first one so successful but in this setting I think it leaves the audience questioning why and adding to the incredulous story. All the shortcomings of the film are because it tries to emulate the first one but in order to even be considered on the same level as the first this film needed to be a lot darker, wittier and graphic and then developed further from that. Really the only positives I can say about this film is the performances from Mila Kunis and William Shatner were brilliant; I think they have done well to breathe life into a dull script and really carried the movie. Parts of the dialogue were also well written ("ribbed for her pleasure" for example) but I think these moments were well out weighed by the negatives. If you have seen the first film and found it to be a masterpiece of both filmmaking and storytelling, then you will need to lower your expectations immensely before seeing this but if you are looking for a b-grade possibly even c-grade movie that's lightly entertaining but still a cut above Sharknado and Paranormal Activity 2 than this film is for you.

LeonLouisRicci You know this is a Killer Movie because there are these icepicks poking your ears for the first fifteen minutes. That was the shrill voice-over narration that could send sane Folks screaming from their seats and adolescents killing the killer of their babysitters.It doesn't get any more pleasant after the ear piercing. The "Musical Interludes" substitute when the voice-over is on break and while not as penetrating they are pathetic and may have you reaching for the volume button or the vomit bag.The humor is humorless, the murders are mundane, the acting is below par, and what passes for any Artistic expression from the Filmmakers is "that's a wrap". This betrays so many expectations and loudly proclaims..."this is all in good clean Serial Killer fun"...but it isn't.It is not anything but embarrassing for all involved and the most surprising thing is that on the DVD commentary the Director and Star actually attached themselves to this with pride. That says a lot.