Carnival of Sinners

1943
Carnival of Sinners
7.3| 1h20m| en| More Info
Released: 07 April 1947 Released
Producted By: Continental Films
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A struggling artist buys a talisman that gives him love, fame and wealth. The talisman is a severed left hand, and it works perfectly, in fact, magically. But of course there is nothing free in this world, and after one year the devil comes and asks for his due.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Continental Films

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Alex da Silva Painter Pierre Fresnay (Brissot) arrives at a secluded mountainside hotel that has been cut off by an avalanche. He carries a box with him and has a rather unpleasant attitude which alienates him from the other guests there. The police may or may not be on his tail as they arrive to ask about a man they have been chasing. When his box is stolen by supernatural forces, he decides it is best to come clean and tell his tale. We are then thrown into a flashback story that explains his life and how he came to have this box, and what its significance is as well as what is inside. It's a story of selling your soul to the devil and things come to an end at this mountainside hotel.It's a good film that keeps you gripped. Fresnay is thoroughly dislikable at the beginning of the film but due to his predicament he wins you over and you understand why he is this way. A small man in a bowler hat, Palau, seems to follow him around. His appearances keep the tension going as he can change fortune but not necessarily in a good way. Fresnay has this box that gives him instant success, wealth, love, etc but it comes at a cost. His love interest is Josseline Gael (Irene) who is pretty straight-talking and whose behaviour also seems influenced by whether or not Fresnay has the box. Her real life story is interesting as she was married to a member of the French Gestapo and was jailed the following year to this film being made. She was subsequently stripped of her French citizenship whilst her husband was executed by a firing squad in 1946.An annoyance at the beginning of the film is that everyone speaks too quickly so that you just about have time to read the subtitles let alone look at the picture of the actor's faces speaking the lines at the same time. It can be frustrating. You need to accustom yourself to this and then things get OK. The plot's theme is interesting and there are good sequences including a line-up of masked men, all previous owners of the box, who have a brief tale to tell. Fresnay's ability comes from painting with his left hand and he signs his name as Maximus Leo. Is this name significant? Yes it is.What would you do if your debt kept doubling everyday and the debtor required payback? Easy, go to the bank and get a loan. Not sure why Fresnay didn't do that. But, then again, the devil doesn't play fair, so would probably conjure up a bank shortfall on that day. Maybe the best thing is to just enjoy the success you've got while it lasts. Fresnay fights back.
morrison-dylan-fan Since having enjoyed seeing his splendid Valley of Hell which I watched with 5 other films that were affected by the Occupation of France,I decided that when watching 100 French films over 100 days that one of them would be from auteur film maker Maurice Tourneur.Talking to a fellow IMDber about Valley,I was caught by surprise,when this very kind IMDber gave me a chance to view another Tourneur title,which led to me getting ready to shake the devils hand.The plot:Hit by an avalanche,the guests find themselves stuck in the hotel.Walking out of the snow, Roland Brissot enters the hotel and asks for a room. Spotting Brissot go to the room,his fellow guests notice that he's lost his left hand,and is also carrying a small coffin.Suddenly,the police run in saying that they are after a little man carrying a coffin.Whilst Brissot takes a call,the lights go out,and Brissot's coffin is stolen.Desperate for help to find the stolen coffin,Brissot decides to reveal to the guests the devilish deal he made with the strange little man.View on the film:Cracking a chopped off left hand over the opening credits (!) director Maurice Tourneur and cinematographer Armand Thirard steam a chilling Gothic Horror atmosphere. Land locking the hotel, Tourneur explores every corner with refined whip-pans that sink into the darkness. Offering a quick shock in the opening credits, Tourneur spends the rest of the film brilliantly handling a foreboding mood,where a dazzling use of silhouettes,huge lingering shadows and a gathering which sends Brissot's (played by a superb,worn-down Pierre Fresnay) deal into the fantastically creepy.Made by the Nazi-run Continental Studio,the screenplay by Jean- Paul Le Chanois gets a grip on Gérard de Nerval's novel to deliver strikingly sharp allegorical shots, via making Brissot'a attempts to get out of the deal lead to hyper- inflation which Brissot cannot escape. Foreshadowing the Gothic final notes with Brissot's artistic hand,Chanois makes Brissot's downfall a devilish delight,with Chanois drowning Brissot with a little devil,a curse hanging over his head,and the most terrifying thing of them all,a pampered diva (played by an icy Josseline Gaël-who got banned from working in movies after joining the French Gestapo) ,as Brissot tries to break the grip of the devils hands.
christopher-underwood Undoubtedly an interesting film from Maurice Tourneur and made the same year his son was in the US making Cat People. The father about 70 when he made this made mostly silent films, the sound ones coming in his later years and to make things more difficult this would have been in occupied France. For me it seems too arch, his style clearly rooted in the silent era there is a tendency for slow methodical explanation and a certain amount of repetition. In an otherwise amazing scene towards the end, we see the chain of people that have been involved in the deals with the devil and it seems incredible today that we would have to go through every single one's story. All the subtlety of his son's film making is missing here and whilst as I say it is interesting to see it can seem like a long 80 minutes.
Edgar Soberon Torchia A few years ago I was attracted to the work of French filmmaker Maurice Tourneur, after reading his IMDb profile. I already knew that his film «La main du diable» had a cult following, and that he was the father of Jacques Tourneur, the famous director of «Cat People», «I Walked with a Zombie» and «Out of the Past»; but I had no idea of his own prestige and importance in the history of cinema. During the silent film period, Maurice Tourneur was as popular as David W. Griffith and Thomas Harper Ince in Hollywood, and his movies had a strong influence due to their visual design refinement. I am yet to see his version of James Fenimore Cooper's «Last of the Mohicans» (1920), selected to the National Film Registry by the US Congress, but I have already seen his adaptations of Maurice Maeterlinck's «The Blue Bird» (also selected to the National Film Registry), and Joseph Conrad's «Victory» (1919). I have just finished watching «La main du diable», a French production made during the last stage of his career, when Tourneur returned to France, tired of the commercialism of the Hollywood films. Connections are often made between Nazi occupation in France and certain films that are or seem to be allegories of this state, as Carné's «Les visiteurs du soir» (1942), or Clouzot's «Le corbeau» (1943), so I would not be surprised if there is an essay linking «La main du diable» to Nazi presence in French territory. If it's true that this reading is possible, the film is fascinating if one takes it as it is, a moral tale with elements of fantasy and subtle horror: in an Alpine hotel, the dull confinement of a group of travelers that are trapped by an avalanche, brightens up with the sudden arrival of a nervous man, with a stump and a small box under his arm. After the box is stolen during a blackout, the travelers become a captive audience (as we, the spectators), listening to the man as he tell his story, from being a luckless painter, to buying a sinister talisman that brings him fame, love and fortune, and being cheated by the devil. The story of course is similar to other cinematic pacts with the devil, as those made by Faust, the Prague student, Jabez Stone in «The Devil and Daniel Webster», the phantom of the Paradise, the investigator in «Angel Heart» or the young lawyer in «The Devil's Advocate», among others. But Tourneur, as Murnau in his «Faust», fascinates us with his visual reading of Gérard Nerval's novel, and creates a glowing monochromatic world of oblique lines, shadows, masks, and an affable little devil, played by a smiling old man who, behind the appearance of a helpless civil servant, hides his treacherous essence. The film is a well-mounted clockwork that reaches its expected conclusion with the same punctuality the devil demands of his creditors. If by chance it crosses your path, don't miss «La main du diable», a work that only asks for 78 minutes of your time.