Shubham Patel Had to give one star and hate the movie. Since glorifying the second Hitler is not a good thing. Hitler on the one side lost, But the Hitler on the other side won.

NikkoFranco Here's the catch, if you're an expatriate living in Germany, Austria or Switzerland, the titles are translated for a broader, local market and we were somehow tricked that this is what Gary won an Oscar for. Art cinemas as they are called, have small seating capacities, perhaps not more than 30. Out of the five who was not snoring was myself and boy, what a lost in translation moment for me. Nevertheless we decided to stay and finish it. I am not sure if Brian Cox is to be blamed, the producers or the scriptwriters. It almost looks like the script is one that should contain a forewarning that says : sensationalized version somewhat based on historical events. If meant to show the domestic Churchills, fail. If meant to be a serious piece on such a figure as Churchill, epic fail. There's only so much talented actors can do and blame them I won't. Please do more in depth research next time before even beginning production. It saves a lot of people the pain and embarrassment.

z-14380 Portrays one of the most heroic men in British history as a coward. This film is so historically innacurate it borders upon treason. Such a shame the premise of the film had so much potential.

eddiesterling-82248 I have often thought I would like to again experience watching films such as Aliens, The Thing, Saving Private Ryan or Blade Runner for the first time. All were exciting and entertaining. What am I served up with now? This tripe. Never mind factual issues, it is just plain boring. Churchill is, possibly, one of the worst films I have watched (well, I stopped after 50 minutes - my jaw was nearly dislocated with yawning). Dreadful. How was this ever released?