freakfire-1 Why is Disney wasting their time with these unoriginal sequels to classic movies? I can hardly fathom another movie studio rehashing their movies as much as Disney does. And I doubt the viewing audience is what they have in mind.Cinderalla III is a 'what if?' movie. What if the stepmother was able to stop Cinderella from being the woman who fits the glass slipper. And so we see a spell and a trick, yet Cinderella still gets her man. That was never in doubt. Yet one of her sisters also turns good.I followed the story, but never gave it much credit. The ending seemed all to perfect. Nothing dramatic happens - like the originals. But instead, it is small things. Wish Disney would do better sequels, but I guess they can only do that with Pirates of the Caribbean. "D"

rorypenland First let me say, that I usually don't like sequels (Aladdin sequels - Lion King Sequels - Ugh!). Few of them come close to the standard of their original. Disney's "Cinderella III: A Twist In Time" is an exception.The story is very well crafted including homage to just about everything from the first. "Cinderella 2: Dreams Come True" (which was a typical quickie sequel - a total waste of time dud) is appropriately never mentioned. The voices are well cast and the animation is movie quality - not a TV show rehash like the extremely disappointing "Princess Tales videos" (shame! shame!) Granted, my child is three and she doesn't know the difference between the bad quality and good quality stuff - but I do and Daddy has to watch these over and over again with his little princess.Without giving away too much, some complain that the evil pumpkin coach scene in this one is a little bit on the scary side. Though my child (again, she's 3) was a bit scared at first, she was excited by it, and Cinderella's comment at the end of the scene made both she and I laugh out loud together. Now she watches that scene again and again.Especially fine performances by the deliciously wicked stepmother, Lady Tremaine and her daughters Drusilla and Anastasia. The opening song is hysterical when it gets them and Drusilla's every sarcastic remark still makes me smile ("A stick... let's beat her with it." / "Oh... I wonder if it fits?"). The music is very good in this one as well.My only disappointment is that they axed the other mouse characters besides Jaq and Gus an Bruno is also missing.But for the money, it is an excellent ride.

goldenrosetuxedo I will say that when I first saw the trailer for this movie, I was impressed. The idea of the stepmother getting a hold of the wand and turning back time is pretty neat! I've not seen the second movie, nor do I plan to.The animation for this film is decent, though sometimes Cinderella looks like a man and her head is too big. The jokes are cheesy and the majority of the plot is see-through, but what can I do? I'm an adult and may have lost some of my child-like innocence. The music is unmemorable...sort of.Good film for children as a sequel but is much too reminiscent of The Little Mermaid in places and other Disney films to be unique. Watch if you're intrigued by the plot setup but don't bother buying this one unless it's for your kids.

khayeh_katuk guy's can i ask a question?,, i can't get this question out of my head since i heard the statement of Cinderella(last part)that goes this way: "And they lived happily ever after again??",, duh!!! isn't it that ever after means 'Forever??' Disney shouldn't have stated during the last part of Cinderella I that they lived happily ever after because what happened in Cinderella III is not a happy part for the Prince and Cinderella.,, can't Disney make other stories to HIGHLIGHT the character of the prince if that's what they are up to., I agree also in the "goofs" posted in wikipedia.org that At the first movie, the king saw Cinderella before he got out, and obviously the Grand Duke, but neither, even when they're not in magic, don't they recognize that Anastasia is not Cinderella."What makes the least sense is that the king even made a face at Anastasia at the ball.,, oh, that not the topic in here anyways, just got carried away because of disappointment......the statement "Lived happily ever after again doesn't make sense for me.. anyways,, the movie is good but not as good as Cinderella I and worse than Cinderella II..,}