pepe4u22 What a waste of time to me this movie took an amusing little movie and made a sequel which basically was a mishmash of ideas and reusing the same jokes from the first. The acting was bad, the premise was absurd and basically it took a five minute sketch and stretched it out for 90 minutes yecch. Basically Deuce has to get back to man whoring to save his old pimp Tj in Amsterdam of all places. This movie used old stereotypes plays on the supposive ignorance of Americans abroad and basically reaches for something funny. All the characters are shallow and silly and it was a wreck...Rob Schneider can be good in small roles but he can not carry a film the new actress who's name i cannot remember basically is your new blonde goddess who falls for Deuce..talk about not happening in real life.

jts0405 Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo was a funny movie that really was a break out role for Rob Schneider. Then after several years when I heard of a sequel being made I thought that it would be worth checking out since the first one was really funny. It started off slow and really killed off Kate pretty quickly. The movie basically had nudity, which the other did not have, yet it still wasn't worth the time or money. Rob Schneider is known for making pointlessly bad comedies, but this took it to a new low. This was even worse than The Animal and that was a bad movie. So please don't waste your time with this movie, because it really sucks.1/10

tom243-1 Personally I couldn't get enough of this film. Though most of the humour was very basic there were a few moments that I found hilarious as well as clever. The scene with the Frenchman at the aquarium was (in my eyes) comic genius. Some of the other comments complain that this movie was offensive towards Europeans but I didn't see any of this - I think anyone from Holland could see this as a tongue in cheek representation of their culture and I highly doubt this movie would cause offence. And truth be told though some of the stereotypes were exaggerated for comic effect it wasn't like the movie was catering to aged and unfounded stereotypes - a lot of the references in this film were loosely based on genuine European/Dutch culture. I also found Eddie Griffin's character very amusing and the overly-homophobic nature of his character was brilliantly portrayed. In a lot of ways it was the acting that saved the film - as they managed to rescue so of the script's downfalls - normally someone eating chips out of a toilet would just be cringe-worthy but Griffin saved it.I would definitely recommend this to friends and the only reason that I only gave it 7/10 is because I realise that though I couldn't stop laughing, it is still quite a basic and very often crude comedy and thus not deserving of a higher score...

DCLOUDkid this one not so much. All of the original stuff from the first one is gone. The plot seems to go nowhere for a long time and when it does pick up, it's not good at all. The only reason this movie is somewhat watchable is Eddie Griffin and though he is funny he's not even the main character. Your supposed to "like" the main character, not feel that he's just as unlikeable as the other characters in the movie feel towards him. The only other good part is the burnt dick thing and the new chicks ass, which the movie also needed more of. Don't watch it unless you're choosing between epic movie or some other garbage movie because you might at least get a chuckle out of this one.