clynns-30118 I watch this movie last night and I love frank Martin and the transporter series. But what I didn't care for is the actress looked 17 years old and of course John looks a lot older. So it was really hard for me to see a connection there. I think they're both great actors and there's a lot of good scenes in the movie. The one where she gets drunk and then they have relations and they are sitting together on the hillside just didn't do it for me. The rest of the movie was awesome and right on great action flick. He needs a girl with a little more Grit.

clarkmick33 I tried watching this movie but I can't!!! I find the main female lead a repulsive ginger freak YUCk every time they show a close up of her face. She acts like a complete slut who should be shut in a asylum. Can someone just edit every scene of her out so I can enjoy the Mantastic Jason Stratham.In the last Transporter 2 there was a skinny flat chested freckle fest that had no sex appeal even when they did dress her in bra and panties which made it more repulsive. The production studio get the action right but they really need to balance it with some nice female lead eye candy Nuff Said :-D :-D :-D

Nexus Engel This is a sequel with no energy and a plot that focuses on all the wrong things. The girl that Frank is stuck with for most of the movie is obnoxious and a frustratingly horrible actress.This could have been a good movie. I mean, it's got Frank having to drive a girl around, with an explosive anklet that'll blast him to smithereens if he's separated from his car. And she's the daughter of a politician who's being blackmailed into signing some document to allow chemical ships to get into the country without a hassle. Oh, and it's got Robert Knepper, an underrated actor, playing the villain.Where did it go wrong? Maybe it was the fact this installment didn't match or surpass the fun ridiculousness of the first two (with the exception of Frank driving his car onto a train--and then THROUGH the train--to get to the bad guy). Or maybe it was the fact that the fight scenes were sped up (they literally fast-forwarded through some of the fights!) and blurry, with too many close-ups for you to tell just what the hell is going on. Oh, and that girl. That girl was terrible.Some people may enjoy this, but for me, it was a huge disappointment.

david-sarkies Well, if there is one cool thing about this movie and that is the name of the director, though I feel that Megaton is probably not his real name but rather his stage name (though I did not think that directors had stage names, only actors). This is actually the better of the Transporter movies, though in many ways it still falls down in a lot of cases. One of the things that I wondered about this film was why they were using a diesel power train in the Ukraine when all of their trains are electrified, and then I realised that the reason for this was to enable Frank to drive the car off of the bridge and along the roof of the train (something you can't do when there are gantries in the way). In fact, the probably with using electric trains in action movies is that it makes it really difficult to have a fight scene on the roof (which is probably why most of America's railway system is not electrified).This one deals with the dumping of environmental waste, though as with most action movies, the theme behind the plot is irrelevant, you just watch the film to see Jason Stratham beat people up and to watch him drive his car and pull ridiculous stunts with it (such as using the tyres to inflate balloons and lift the car out of the water, or as I have just mentioned, driving it off a bridge and onto the roof of a train).Transporter Three is somewhat more entertaining than the last two, but that probably has something to do with the fact that this time around (I have now seen it three times, which is probably two times two many for these films – and for some reason purchased them on DVD as well) I watched it in three parts, so it ended up breaking up the monotony of this film. Now that I have watched these three films (again) and written commentaries on them, I can now think about getting rid of these films (hopefully Cash Converters will buy them).