haney63 Luckily, I did not pay to rent this movie. In fact, the time spent watching it was not worth losing. I am a fan of lower budget movies, especially in the horror genre, but, there has to be some substance to make the movie viable. I looked at the cast, and it seemed respectable enough. I noticed that it "won" some awards, and saw a number of IMDb fans had given it enough clout to pull it above a 4.0 rating, so, why not watch? Wow....The only award I could possibly see it winning is the Razzie for "Worst movie of the year." i Murders was all about poor writing and plot holes, enough to fill a number of really bad horror movies. The acting was "sub-parr", at best. The editing would have not gotten a passing grade in a community college movie making class. Character development was to the point that even caring about who was killed or who killed whom wasn't even something to be considered. Anyone giving this flick a rating above 3 would have to be either a member of the cast and crew, or a relative. In short, what a waste of media, time, and talent......next movie please!

tedg You know what? This is pretty incompetent in a few ways, but the incompetence works for it.This is a murder mystery of the old school. You are introduced to characters. Murders are being committed. Clues are placed around. Many suspects and many motives are given.There is a chatroom angle, but that does not matter. There is a horror genre angle, but that does not matter either.What matters is that you really are allowed to be the detective. There are none of the detective genre devices that you expect to find. The situation is very chaotic, more nonsensical than the conventions allow. That's what makes it work. Yes, you are a bit surprised at the end. But they play fair, and in the denouement, you have the film flashbacks to attest that the solution was under your nose.The production values are pretty bad. And the lines are profoundly juvenile. But the mystery itself: cool stuff.Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.

Chris Gilbert I always trust Internet Movie Database for user comments and ratings and therefore before I rented this "movie" I read some of them and was like...; cool, this looks like the kind of movie I like and looks like I will enjoy it. Well... What a disappointment, I mean, I know this was gonna be a low budget B grade movie but all the comments in here that claim this movie to be good and that it is a "refreshing thriller", please! Are you serious?As I sat down with anticipation to watch the movie I was straight away greeted by an horrible group of soap opera actors. The script was obviously written by a 5 year old child and the whole movie budget was spent on the main actress' huge LCD computer screen."Facespace"?! What?! This terrible attempt to rip off internet 2 of the most famous internet social networks shows how good this movie is.Well... everyone has got their own opinion and taste and mine is that this movie doesn't even deserve 1 star

pstev Maybe the worst part of this movie is it isn't so bad as to be unintentionally funny, but it's close.(Charles Durning's psychiatric sessions bring bad acting to a new level). The only suspense in the plot is how some pretty good actors managed to get into this embarrassment of a film. Let's start with William Forsythe, the college professor, who we are suppose to believe much younger attractive women are drawn too. Only in a fat middle aged man's fantasy world could that be true. And this movie. Nothing in this movie is very believable. I feel bad about pointing out just one persons bad acting when there are so many, but Brooke Lewis' performance as the FBI agent is the most frightening thing in the this 'horror' movie. It looks worse next to Tony Todd's performance as her partner who is actually quite good making her look all the worse. The bad plot(you'll know who did it in the first 15 minutes) and acting gets overshadowed by a terrible script. Maybe its a situation where a director falls in love with his own words. Worse dialog you have never heard. Maybe no actor could do a good performance given what they had to work with. So if you are stuck seeing it see it for laughs and maybe you won't feel so bad about wasting two hours of your life.