Joe Bob Jones There are few gay, or straight, films which fling such disturbed and desperate lead characters into the sparkly gutter like Mala Noche. That summary is trite at best, but to watch this movie is to fall into a film noir which won't give you any love back. Excellent and gobsmackingly short-ish cash register rings of warning. Don't embrace these sickly, nasty characters, but do get enveloped. You can't help it. Everyone sucks, everyone is dirty, nasty, and sadly dreamy. Gus made a gorgeous pile of human stink with this one, and it is completely addictive. Fabulous film. Gus Van Sant may have jumped the shark with some later stuff, but this, boy, this is good. Fans of grit say: Must see.

Falconeer "Mala Noche/Bad Night" is immediately recognizable as a Gus Van Sant film, with it's precisely cool and artistic style. From the opening shots in the box car, as the two Mexican friends sneak across the border, shadows play upon their faces, emphasizing the fear and excitement that these guys must feel. It is surprising to hear this called a "low budget" film; "Mala Noche" has the look of a polished and professional film. Blockbusters such as "Sin City" with their huge budgets, attempted to achieve the look of this one, and failed. The story is simple, and takes a back seat to the imagery. A normal-looking guy in his 20's develops a "crush" on one of the young Mexican immigrants who spends his days hanging around the Portland streets near the "gringo's" shop. Walt professes his "love" to 18 year old Johnny. However the fact that they don't speak the same language and have nothing in common, make this more a case of sexual "lust." Johnny, who has no interest in men, lets Walt into his life, if only for the benefits of some free food, cash, and rides around the city. It is quite sad and tragic to witness the Mexican boy treating Walt so cruelly, but Walt's behavior is not much better, treating the boy like a piece of meat by offering him $15 for sex. After being rejected and abandoned by Johnny, Walt finds himself in a shaky relationship with Johnny's best friend Roberto. When Roberto enters the picture, the film gets even better. It is interesting to witness how these two outcasts relate, as they struggle to understand each others worlds. Roberto, played by Ray Monge is more likable than the hardened Johnny, and possesses this quality that makes you want to take care of him. When he becomes sick, Walt does just that, and this is the most unforgettable thing about "Mala Noche." This is one of the very few gay-themed films that is actually "cool," and not embarrassing to watch. Van Sant made the surprising and wise decision to make Walt a totally normal, straight-acting, straight-looking guy. Most films present gays in the typical stereotype, feminine looking and acting men appearing foolish and camp. Of course, the best thing about Van Sant's debut film is it's style, and the phenomenal way he uses black and white to portray mood. Each frame could be cut out and hung on the wall, it is that beautiful. This is the true definition of "cult cinema." Finally available after years of obscurity, this is now available on a high quality DVD, featuring razor-sharp picture quality and good sound. For fans of Van Sants earlier work, "Mala Noche" is a must-see film. Also those who remember Portland in the 80's will get a kick out of all the street scenes, featuring locals who, mostly seem to like drinking "Night Train." "Mala Noche" is a classic..

BandofInsiders As the stagnant state of films in the 1980's was still in its inevitable decline the emergence of a new breed of American independent directors saw this as a moment full of opportunity. Gus Van Sant decided to turn his camera on the outcasts of a small Portland neighborhood and create an intimate portrait of 3 young men at an important turning point in their lives. Not only is Mala Noche an influential example of 1980's independent cinema it also serves as a milestone for the New Queer Cinema that would become more prevalent in the 1990's. Gus Van Sant's stark debut would serve as a blueprint for many directors to come. Mala Noche focuses on convenience store worker Walt's and his infatuation with a young immigrant Jonny who is fresh off riding the rails from Mexico with his friend Pepper. From the film's first scene its unabashed open "gayness" lets the viewer know what they are in for. Van Sant makes no attempt to justify his films openly gay stance instead he embraces it and explores the beauty and darkness that accompany it. Walt and Johnny coexist solely based on their parasitic relationship. Walt gushes romanticized convictions for a boy he knows little about, such as "I want to drink this Mexican boy" or "I have to show him that I'm gay for him." While Johnny uses Walt for a house to crash and the occasional joy ride in his car. At the same time both are uncomfortable with their personal situation but can't help to hold on to what they have left.John Campbell's bleak camera work adds a lot to the look of the seedy underbelly of Portland almost as if it could have been shot as a documentary. Mala Noche is one the few films that benefits from working on such a small budget. It gives the viewer a sense that Van Sant was truly in touch on a deeper level with his subjects than just an "actor/director" level. Ultimately Mala Noche is a profound representation of America's emerging "gay" cinema and an important document of Portland in the mid 1980's. Gus Van Sant would go onto make stronger films but this fascinating debut will show he has shown a strong passion for his films and his subjects right from the beginning.

findoutwho OK, granted: The movie was filmed in the early or mid 80's I think, and you might even claim that the latino talent pool was not as big back then as it is now. But C"MON! The guys who were cast as the young Mexican homeless boys were HORRIBLE! Spanish is my first language and I could tell that the actors who portrayed JOhny and Robert were not fluent at all in Spanish which for this film it is a MAJOR point since they re supposed not to speak English. I guess that explains the reason why when Johny had dialogue, the camera was not on him, and the times when he spoke and the camera was on him there was no sync. I am 100 percent sure that they used someone else's voice ( a bad actor's at that) to do the voice over for Johny. For someone who speaks Spanish it was PAINFUL to listen to the monotone, emotion-deprived delivery of the lines. I don't know under what circumstances these two horrible actors were cast but I am sure the director did not do a thorough audition process to get the best actors. The actor who played Robert was better at ATTEMPTING to sound better in Spanish. I still don't know if he was fluent in Spanish, which it sounds like he was. And if he was then he was just saying the grammatically incorrect lines given to him by the director without complaining about not being correct. One of the examples is when he is being harassed by the white guy. Roberto says:" Para. No me molesto". Translated that means: " Stop. It doesn't bother me".or " Stop. I don't get bothered". Im sure the intention of the writer was: " Stop. Don't bother me" which should've been: "Para. No me molestes". The only character that spoke good Spanish was the guy who was telling the story of how they crossed the border. And I could bet the reason that being is because probably he really went thru that and he was just being interviewed ( he did not NEED to act)I doubt that was scripted. That part when he's talking, it totally threw me out of the movie, because it had a documentary feel to it and then to go back into the bad acting was like, disconnected. Among other things,it was torture when they had the Spanish speakers dialogue on the background. They kept on repeating the same dialogue over and over and over again! same lines over and over! I guess it would work for non-Spanish speakers, because they just hear a foreign language and they have no idea whats being said. But when you understand the language you get so frustrated that you wanna throw a shoe at the TV and make it shut up. I really like Gus Van Sant's directing but I have no idea, and im very curious to know what pressed or forced Mr Gus Van Sant to cast these horrible actors. Was it pressure from the producers, or did he honestly think these guys were the BEST?