mark.waltz A plane crashing into electrical wires and falling into a barn. Another scene with the wing falling off and the struggle of the pilot to get out. Thrilling, yes, but excruciatingly dull otherwise. A veteran cast lead by Richard Dix, Edmund Lowe and Wendy Barrie tries to keep this moving, but unless you are interested in aviation, why would you want to know every detail about what it takes to make sure planes are safe how aircraft corporations are done. At least Barrie has things to do here other than just look pretty. Playing Dix's sister, she's instrumental in helping him get started in the aircraft business after being injured as a stunt pilot. I can see the parallels between this and the life of Hughes aircraft founder Howard Hughes (who ironically later bought RKO studios where this was made), but unlike "The Aviator", this never goes anywhere outside the plot of aircraft, a boring subject when it's nothing but. Whoever let this go in front of the camera without insisting on some diversions from the technical aspects of the plot must have had their head in the clouds.

MartinHafer The film has two main themes. A world-famous aviator (Dix) has slowly destroyed his once amazing career and he has his pilot's license revoked for being drunk in the cockpit. The film is about his rebuilding his life, though through very long stretches of the film he is absent or practically absent as the second plot took precedence during most of the film. A small aircraft manufacturer is trying to design a fighter plane in order to win a lucrative government contract. So much of the film concerns the struggles they go through as well as a budding relationship that never seems to get off the ground between the project manager and a female draftsman.As far as the plane goes, I know most who see the film won't notice some of the problems with how they executed the flying sequences and the plane itself. While the plane is supposed to be "the latest thing" and capable of flying over 400 m.p.h., the design is actually similar to experimental craft being produced from 1932-1936 (looking a lot like the airplane used in the old Universal Studios intros), so in so many ways the craft was totally obsolete. This isn't a real issue for the average person, but hey, for us aviation buffs it is noticeable. But what IS noticeable even for the casual viewer are the silly physics of the plane as it flies. It's very obviously a model and it executes turns that no plane EVER could make--making the tiniest loop-to-loops and spins in history! A little more money and effort could have made for much more realistic and less silly flying sequences. However, even despite these problems, the movie is about a seldom discussed topic and I found it very interesting from a historical standpoint.As for me, personally, I would score this movie a 6 or 7, since I am a huge fan of the history of aviation and am a school teacher. However, I also understand that for the average viewer, this film will no doubt be pretty dull stuff and provide little entertainment. Also, as far as a the romance goes, it never really made much sense and never seemed to get past minor infatuation. Plus, for fans of Richard Dix (and there must be a few out there), his role in the film is pretty small and not especially heroic--despite him receiving top billing.

malcolmgsw From the early thirties to the early forties there seems to have been a plethora of films about the development of aviation.The modest aims of this film and the fact that it only lasts 76 minutes seems to indicate that by the time this film was made the interest in these type of films was waning,about to be overtaken by war films.It had to be said that the model work in this film is all too obvious and looks as if it was made in the producers garage rather than by a major studio.The plot itself is routine and for the umpteenth time we have a hero redeem himself in the final reel.Richard Dix is one of those square jawed hero figures who no longer exist in films.He is the only real reason to watch this film.

soso-7 Hard to believe the progress of flight in the 20th century. From 1903 to 1940, the technological advance was as profound as the internet.But in 1940,guys still built planes in their garages.The planes were tested with fingers crossed. A single guy would design a plane, build it and test it.Some crashed, some died, some succeeded. This picture is all these stories,plus a little romance. Very entertaining.This is the true story of Mc Lean Air Corp ( later acquired by Hughes himself).Classic line: He shouldn't be allowed to go up in an elevator.