tdsftdsf Well it's definitely not a horror movie ....and i didn't expect that . It appears that there were others that would disagree . I would say it was similar to Blair Witch but ...I was more disappointed by that than I was this .Blair Witch was literally all build up and no pop ? This had at least a pop- but that's all . I didn't like the way it skirts the boundaries of reality and fiction . I reads as if this occurred ....and upon searching , students did vanish in that area but not these , and not in the same place .then it shows a missing poster with local phone numbers ...which is janky . If this had been recovered footage and was exactly as it played i would say 9 . But since they say , it was recovered footage and don't play it into the script of the movie it's misleading .....and as a complete fictitious romp ....it falls flat ....as a movie that tried to trick the viewers into thinking it is recovered real footage .....boo hiss. Weak

cjrmnf I think the acting was meant to represent real college students, not actors. If you watch it as if it were real, you'd see it in a different light.The actors looked like real people, not models...that was a plus. It also didn't contain a lot of CGI "stuff" that other people try to use to scare you. The only problem I had with it was it wasn't creepy enough though it did keep you guessing about when and where the bad guy/girl would jump out.Was the acting stellar? No but it wasn't nearly as bad as advertised. I watched "The Apparition" with Ashley Green (Alice from Twilight) and she was absolute TRASH in it...you EXPECT stellar acting from her, not these guys.I'm not claiming it's great but it's not bad...decent for such a low budget and worth a look if you like found footage films.

Nelson Matos This is a pretty amazing pointless movie, like the others reviewers stated, that's nothing going on for most of the time, and when it's happening something, it's like it wasn't, since it's so incredibly boring.The acting, the script, the woods, they're beyond terrible, and the story is completely uninteresting or scary at all. There isn't any moment in the movie that scares you or make you chill.They're supposed to be deep in the woods, but for at least for a couple of times, you can clearly listen the cars passing by in a road very close.If you wan't a good night sleep, you shouldn't hesitate on watching this, or if you're still afraid to fall asleep because of Freddy Kruger, then this is the cure, because you will sleep safe and sound in the woods for sure.It couldn't be more static even if it was broadcast by radio.So, stay away from the nap! Best regards

china-lizard This was, by far, the absolutely most boring movie I've ever seen. ***SPOILERS***What's more, nothing was explained. There was some quickly thrown- together exposition at the end that tries to give some reasons for why things might have happened, but in general...none of it made sense.I don't understand why the little girl was included at the very end of the credits. She's listed as "Spirit" in the cast list here. Does that mean she was the ghost of the woods? Did she die there? Was she saying it was all someone's dream? I....I don't understand.I'm also tired of found-footage movies claiming that "everything is so totally real!" No. No it's not. Stop telling lies, and just get on with the story. My suspense alarm, unfortunately, kept going off, expecting jump scares or something...ANYTHING....but they never happened. In fact...I don't know what the ending was. Something about an old man? And the white girl suddenly becomes possessed I guess..? Leaving out details doesn't make your movie more spooky, film student writers. It just leaves you with a badly-written script. :/Low-budget doesn't have to mean "bad movie". Keep that in mind as well..