The Cranes Are Flying

1957 "The compelling story of a girl's impassioned search for happiness."
The Cranes Are Flying
8.3| 1h37m| en| More Info
Released: 12 October 1957 Released
Producted By: Mosfilm
Country: Soviet Union
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Veronika and Boris come together in Moscow shortly before World War II. Walking along the river, they watch cranes fly overhead, and promise to rendezvous before Boris leaves to fight. Boris misses the meeting and is off to the front lines, while Veronika waits patiently, sending letters faithfully. After her house is bombed, Veronika moves in with Boris' family, into the company of a cousin with his own intentions.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Mosfilm

Trailers & Images

Reviews

thinbeach Boris volunteers for the war effort, leaving behind his lover Veronica, and while away on the battlefield she is married to his cousin whom she doesn't love. Despite her marriage, Veronica determinedly holds onto the belief that Boris is still alive and will come back to her, and the filmmakers paint her every situation influenced by his absence, as though she can not live a waking moment without thought of him. The whole plot - the whereabouts and safety of Boris - hinges on a curious detail that he never writes letters to her or his family, and thus remains clouded in mystery. We are never given a reason for this, with only a vague suggestion of mail difficulties, which the cynic in me can't but feel is used as a cheap and convenient plot device. I'm sure these things happened throughout the war, and I don't doubt their emotional toil, but the storytelling in this film appears flimsily staged, which is its greatest flaw. With mostly poor acting (though Veronica is quite good, doing her best to carry the film on her over burdened shoulders), pointed dialogue, a few coincidences, and a sappy script, it never manages to suspend our disbelief, and always feels like a made for the screen melodrama. There are some very nice shots throughout, but equally, there are shots so attention seeking in their grandiosity they only manage to detract from the vision, and add to the unreality. Still, you have to give credit to the director for trying something, as the material didn't give much to work with.
Robert J. Maxwell What a striking picture, especially coming from the Soviet Union in 1957. Some of the shots resemble, oh, I don't know, nouvelle vague. The director was Mikhail Kalatozov. He makes splendid use of light values and composition. The shadows are stark black, and if there are four people involved in a confrontation the figures may be arranged at three different levels on a staircase. The plot is pointed towards patriotism on everyone's part. There is nothing resembling propaganda in this love triangle, any more than there was in the abominable "Pearl Harbor." It's a celebration of the ability of most ordinary people to endure hardship. And that hardship was very real in Russia, from the beginning with the German invasion to the ultimate triumph. First, the Russians had about 8 million deaths in the military, and about 13 million civilians lost their lives. For comparison the total American deaths, both military and civilian, were about 420,000. Moreover, as the Nazi threat to the industrial centers of cities like Moscow and Stalingrad increased, the Soviets packed up both workers and plants and move them across the Ural Mountains. Imagine, say, St. Louis being physically move west of the Rockies.But this is the story basically of a woman, Veronica, whose lover is marched off to war, whose family is killed in an air raid, who moves in with the family of her fiancé, who is raped by her fiancé's brother, who takes up with her rapist, who is sufficiently shamed by her betrayal of her lover at the front that she is barely stopped from committing suicide. Her fiancé is reported to have been wounded and died at the front, but no one has actually seen him buried. Is he still alive somewhere? Evidently not, because Veronica brings an armload of flowers to the train bringing the soldiers home, hoping to find him in the milling crowd. But he's not there. Tearfully she begins distributing flowers, bit by bit, to the noisy celebrants at the station -- bearded old men, young men in uniform, babies, grief-stricken babushkas, little boys, everyone. Well -- what else can she do but recognize that the victory in the Great Patriotic War dwarfs her personal tragedy. "It doesn't take much to see that the problems of three little people don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world." Veronika is a decent actress. The casting is especially precise because neither she nor her boyfriend Boris are extraordinarily beautiful. They're agreeable to look at, but rather ordinary. Veronika is not Olga Kurilenko, and Boris is no, well, whatever the male equivalent of Olga Kurilenko might be. There are no speeches about Mother Russia. Stalin's name is never mentioned. He was a complete bastard before and during the war and killed more Russians than the Nazis did. There IS one victory speech at the end. A returning soldier shouts to the crowd that we must never let war happen again and we must pursue peace. The Germans are called "brutes," once, but that's all. The enemy is war itself. The sentiment must be justified because we all seem to salute it as we pass it on the way to the next war.I feel I have to expatiate a bit on the direction and camera work because probably most people watching the movie won't recognize how innovative two Soviet movies were at the time, how much impact they had on the West. In the companion piece, "Ballad of a Soldier," for instance, there is a scene is which a Russian soldier is running towards the elevated camera, sprinting like hell to avoid a German tank that's pursuing him.The camera is held still as the soldier rushes under and past it, disappearing off the screen. When the tank races past the same location, the camera follows the tank by leaning so far forward that the image on the film -- tank chasing man -- is upside down. That's nothing now, of course, when cameras twirl around and do pirouettes, but in 1957 that technique was NEW.
Jevon Dasilva This is one of the most breathtaking films of all time. Beautifully written, directed and acted. The cinematography is of legend. I cannot think of a more heartbreaking and real view of youth and war. No matter which country you call home, there is no denying the story that this brilliant Russian director conveys on this film.Without getting into the plot or the story, just know that this tale is one for the ages. You will not be disappointed by this film. No matter how many times I watch it, I am always captivated how they made a war movie from the perspective of the characters in the film, and how they managed to convey the complexities of love, life, family, loyalty as well as the harshness of war and how destitute and desperate it leaves not only the characters, but humanity as a whole.
gavin6942 Veronica plans a rendezvous with her lover, Boris, at the bank of the river, only for him to be drafted into World War II shortly thereafter.I know very little about Soviet film. Really my only experience after the 1930s that quickly comes to mind is "Stalker". I am sure there are others, including other Tarkovsky films, but I am drawing a blank. This one is a nice exception to the forgettable films.Any story of Russia in World War II is good. Americans like to believe they single-handedly defeated Japan and Germany, conveniently forgetting that Russia was the primary opponent of Germany at the time. More films covering that cannot hurt. But then add a romantic angle? Excellent! There is something rather French about this film, which seems appropriate... the cultured class of Russia always seemed to love the French.