The Foreigner

2003 "If they think they can stop him, they're dead wrong."
3.4| 1h35m| R| en| More Info
Released: 01 June 2003 Released
Producted By: Columbia Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

This story is about a freelance agent (Seagal) who is the courier of a package from France to Germany. He soon finds that many people want to get their hands on it.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Columbia Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Maciej Bugajak Although the film was shot in Poland, which should make me happy ( i live here) but it did not.The only shot of Warsaw is a meaningful , ugly shot of one of the bridges.Max Ryan is an interesting actor but forcing him to appear with the lit cigarette in all scenes , even when he kills is ridiculous.Also , the film was shot in 2002 and i do believe the action takes place the same year. So why all the phones in Poland have an ancient dial and those in Berlin the keys ? I had key phone at late 70' in Poland , the hotels probably a little later.I write this in the middle of watching (commercial break), but i don't expect a positive change... Anyway, i haven't seen Steven in a good film for a long time ... Is it all about the money?
Comeuppance Reviews Jonathan Cold (Seagal)...is a guy named Jonathan Cold. He's also a former "deep cover operative" (whatever that means) and at the moment is living in Paris. Because he's American, perhaps that makes him "the foreigner"(?) but now he has been entrusted to deliver a certain very valuable package from France to Germany. He doesn't know what's in the package, but he does know that a man named Dunoir (Ryan) has been tasked to assist him, and the person he's delivering it to is wealthy industrialist Jerome Van Aken (Harry Van Gorkum...or is it Jerome Van Aken as Harry Van Gorkum...not really sure). Along the way, Cold finds out that a lot of baddies and goons want to try to stop him from delivering the package, including Mimms (Augustus). So Cold deals with them the only way he knows how, i.e., coldly. Just slightly more aggressive than giving them the cold shoulder. When Dunoir turns out to not be all that he says he is, Cold turns to his brother Sean Cold (Pierce) for help, but not before going to the funeral of their deceased father Jackson Cold. Will the package be revealed? Will it get into the right hands? It truly becomes a "Cold War" as Jonathan attempts to complete his mission. Will he succeed? What's good about The Foreigner is that it looks more professional than a lot of Segal's other DTV work of late. Maybe that's because there was talk of this going to the movie theater. Regardless, there is more style to this outing than usual. And the fact that it was actually shot in Germany and Poland, as opposed to Bulgaria, really does make a difference and helps to convey a classier look. But, to be realistic, this movie is basically a poor man's The Transporter (2002). Not to be cruel, but if you've ever thought that watching Jason Statham is a bit too exhausting because he's so active and in shape, we think we've found the movie for you.It hurts to overly criticize this particular Seagal romp. Because you can tell they were at least trying this time around to imbue the film with some sort of style and quality. Director Oblowitz also made Out For A Kill that same year, 2003, with Seagal. Maybe he couldn't get enough of his winning charm. But then again, they haven't worked together since. Oblowitz includes some things that fans have seen before, such as an all-important "disc" (which seems to pop up a lot), and plenty of 90's-style techno music on the soundtrack. But, believe it or not, the plot is actually overly convoluted and even slow at times. Had the movie only been shorter in length, and, please forgive the pun, had some of the fat trimmed from it, The Foreigner could have ranked pretty darn high in the Seagal standings. But once you see the silly quick-cutting effects during the fight scenes, that kind of dooms the movie.Not that there aren't some worthwhile moments: The age difference between the supposed "brothers" Jon and Sean Cold is amusing - Jonathan could be Sean's father. The movie overall could have used more Sean Cold (or "Seanathan", as we called him) - the actor who played him, Jeffrey Pierce, was engaging, and the plot thread connecting the brothers wasn't really expounded upon too much. Maybe Seagal worried about being upstaged. Plus there is dialogue such as Van Aken saying "Eliminate Cold", and Seagal talking about his old buddy Delbert, which we think he also did in Fire Down Below (1997), but can't quite remember.There are certainly worse Seagals out there - at this point in his career he'd yet to sink to the utter depths of the execrable Kill Switch (2008) - but it all depends on your tolerance for his output. He sure has a "love him or hate him"-style fanbase, and we try to take him movie by movie, but we feel we know him almost, we've been following his career for so long. A Seagal action movie is just that, a Seagal action movie. This one in particular is largely kept afloat by the cinematography. It's by far the best part of the film. If you try to imagine these same proceedings, but not shot as well, the results are not great. So in the end, it's kind of mid-range Seagal, aspiring for better, but probably will only appeal to his fans.
imdb-reg-therealviking This time Mr. Seagal took some unemployed British actors to Poland. Possibly also to Germany and France. In Poland he found cheap military apparel. Of course there are lots of ruins in Eastern Germany as well. Eastern European stunt men are really difficult to describe.It is not the first time, Mr. Seagal makes a budget film this way. His own performance was rather boring. He hardly ever fought hand to hand this time.For some reason some of the hired guns in the film were said to have been speaking Danish. I have no idea where he got that idea. I didn't hear them speak Danish. I can hardly hear what Mr. Seagal says in this film.This will be an hour of my life, which I will never get back, nor remember. That's why I write this review. Still another thirty minutes left of this discount product.
annettep38 Why on earth does five US keep repeating this one? the title actually says it all: the plot is as clear as a book read in a language you never heard of and that resembles to nothing.You'll see ninety minutes of changing locations, most of them will be blown up later on in the movie. Right in the beginning you see a nice little farm typical for the Berry, which is in the movie moved close to Paris but then it does not survive the "transport" to the Isle de France very well: it explodes 1 minute later. there are also two gangster who have no tongues, as if that would make sense in the world of SMS and internet, let alone pencil and paper.It just goes on like that, nothing makes sense in this story. my only credit goes to the cameraman, the camera is excellent.