wisconsinator "Something came through here last night and killed my two prize shoats." I remember going home after seeing the movie in 1972, to look up what was a shoat. It is a young weaned pig. Yes, the music is hokey, or corny, but it sets a logical tone for this film. The man who is near rating it, should be near rating for a living, because he has such a perfect voice for it. The sound of "the creature" vocalizing reminds me of a bear.Here's a song sung about the creature:The Legend of Boggy Creek" Lyrics and Music: Earl E. Smith Sung by: Chuck BryantThis is where the story plays, A world on which we seldom gaze, A page from the book of yesterdays, Birds and beast and wind and water.Here beneath the bright blue sky, No man smoke blinds the eagle's eye. And things that crawl or swim or fly, Feed and breed and live and die.Here the sulfur river flow, Rising when the storm cloud blows. And this is where the creature goes, Safe within a world he knows.Perhaps he dimly wonders why, There is no other such as I. To touch, to love, before I die, To listen to my lonely cry.

TheRedDeath30 I find that genre cinema is very subjective. A great drama is a great drama from the 30s to the 60s to the current. When we start talking about genres, though, from comedy to horror to sci-fi, they are often very much a product of their time and, quite often, one's opinion of a movie in that genre depends on time and place. There are a lot of bad 80s horror movies that I love. I won't try to tell you that they are good, but they are great to me. I can't help but feel that this is the case with those who love this movie. To be fair, this was a monster hit at the time, but that really only leaves me to wonder if people in 1972 just needed something better to do with their time.I was in elementary school at the dawn of the 80s and I used to look forward to those days when the teacher would wheel in that reel-to- reel movie projector. The smell of the bulbs and the film, the sounds of the spool, the look of the movies. It's still such a hot-wire memory for me. For those too young to remember, this reference is meaningless, but this movie is exactly the kind of thing I imagine watching on a sunny afternoon, sitting on my rug square, in a 3rd grade class on that projector. That's about the quality of it, too.Frankly, the film is terrible. The acting is atrocious, because most aren't actors, they are the real life people re-enacting their experiences. The music is cheesy. So many people on here are talking about how great it is. Really? Really??? Bad folk music that was dated two months after it came out and sounds downright hokey now. Wisely, we never really see the monster, but that's also one of the things hurting the movie. Yep, it's a guy in a Halloween store gorilla suit. We probably didn't want to see it much more than we do, but a little more monster would have gone a long, long way in this movie because there's just nothing else here.I'll break this movie down for you in one paragraph. This guy saw Bigfoot outside his house, there was some weird noise, there was a dark shape. This woman and her kids saw Bigfoot. There is more running, some more noises and some more vague shapes. Repeat this for about a dozen more encounters along the way. That's all you get. Like watching a dryer to see if the red sock will fall a different way this time, it's an endless litany of the same experiences, acted out poorly, hoping something will change with this one. Eventually, you are praying that Bigfoot will shred one of these people just to give you something different.Okay, it's supposedly a landmark movie. The first pseudo- documentary style horror film. That might be the case, but that doesn't make it interesting or exciting. I think I've only given a rating this low to a handful of movies, but this one deserved it. If you didn't see it at the drive-in in 1972 and it didn't scare you as a kid and you still have some childhood impression of it, then quite simply there is nothing, at all, worth watching here.

a_baron If there is one word that sums up this film, it is boring. Presented in documentary format, it is only in the last twenty minutes or so there is any action. One does not expect action as such in a documentary, but neither does one expect to be sent to sleep.In spite of this being the legend of Boggy Creek we are left in no doubt that the creature is supposed to be very real, based loosely as it is on genuine sightings, that is genuine as reported, not genuine as the creature is real. What does it want, why is it attacking us? Well, if you shoot at the poor thing and especially if you wound it, you can't really expect it to want to make friends. Granted this film was made on a low budget with an amateur cast, but it still leaves much to be desired. The music isn't bad, but that is only to be expected as it was commissioned from a professional composer.

abigailjeffries This is the very first Bigfoot/Sasquatch horror movie that I ever saw, and it was great! The film itself is what got me started on Bigfoot movies. After seeing this one, I had to watch more. The opening scene of the film in which the little boy was running across the field to get away from the creature had a big impression on me alone. The early 70's music made it almost epic, it was just one of the best movie scenes in a movie I'd ever watched. Most of the time the music in the film was good, which in my opinion, helped the film quite a bit. It was smart of Charles B. Pierce not to show the creature's face a lot, so when you see it for a couple of seconds in the end it's startling. What else is cool about the movie is even though it shows dead animals and has some violence, it's rated G. Also, it shows the creature's huge three-toed footprint later on in the movie. This is a great movie and is worth watching!