stephanie-85859 Got hooked in with the first few episodes, then watched it as a comedy cos it was so bad, especially the acting. Oh and don't expect the people with guns to win in a fight with a sword!!! What nonsense!!!

RyanTheStoryteller Back in 1939 Agatha Christie published a book called And Then There Were None. In this book a group of people are trapped on a deserted island. Even though they are quite sure that they are the only people on the island one by one they start to be murdered. There was a great deal of fear in the hearts of each of the characters because they knew that the most likely scenario was that one of them was the murderer. But there was also the nagging fear that there might indeed be someone else on the island that they didn't know about. And Then There Were None is considered to be one of Agatha Christie's best novels and is by far her most financially successful. As a result of this fame there have over the years been numerous horror movies made based on the same premise of a group of people trapped on an island being killed off one at a time with no way of getting off.In 2009 CBS aired this single season, 13 episode show called Harper's Island. When I first heard of this show it looked like just another cheap carbon copy of the template Christie employed in her classic novel. However, it turned out to be a very different and interesting take on the trapped-on-an-island-with-a-nutcase-killer story. The story is set on a fictional island off the Washington coast and features a previously supposed dead, serial killer named John Wakefield. The difference that I found so fascinating about this was the fact that this was not a deserted island. Harper's Island was an inhabited island with hundreds of people with all the normal stuff that one would find in any other town.I found that way of doing things interesting because this type of story has so often depended on the fact that the characters are cut off from any help or escape. The way the creators of the show were able to make it all work was by keeping the first several murders secret from the characters. The people that were killed early on in the show were people who were supposedly about to leave the island anyway, flighty people who had a habit of taking off suddenly and without warning and people who most of the characters didn't know were on the island anyway. One murder was even disguised as a suicide. Of course, eventually people start realizing what is going on and, like any good mystery, suspicion falls on several people before it is finally revealed who is behind it all.In the end, in addition to John Wakefield there was also a bad guy among the main group of characters that was committing some of the murders himself. Though this was a pretty good show, there were several things that I didn't really like that much. First, when our crazy man finally shows his face and starts killing people openly you have one of the most annoying horror flick clichés. That is the whole thing where five people with loaded shotguns can't seem to kill one kook with a long ugly knife even though he is standing ten feet away from them. The other thing that bugged me was in the second to the last episode when we found out who Wakefield's accomplice was. I know with these types of reveals it is supposed to be a huge surprise but when Henry turned out to be Wakefield's son and accomplice it was so unexpected and such a big surprise to me that it didn't really seem plausible.

poisonwc I really liked this program. I know it's scary to think there's someone out there who would kill people in such horrible ways, but you have to give the killer points for creativity. I mean seriously. My only real complaint is that we find out *way* too early in the series that John Wakefield is still alive. Personally, I wish Trish had turned out to be the killer. Can you just imagine? I will admit it seemed a pretty elaborate way of bringing the one you want to you ... I mean, he knew where she was, why didn't he just go get her? Harper's Island does have quite a few plot holes and questionable situations, but it's still a worth the watch. And I still think Trish should have done it.

alexoqp I forced myself to watch up to ep. 4, but then I couldn't take any more of it: nothing makes sense, it is badly written, the characters are designed with such stupidity that you can not identify with any of them. The time line is wonky, the disappearances don't worry anyone ("Maybe he decided to leave the island" ! Yeah, right, you travel hundreds of miles, you're on an island for a wedding, and just on a whim, you go without saying goodbye.) The stag party: they catch at least a cod type of fish, and when they come back, they hand in two obviously shop-bought salmons, the cod has gone! Then you see people wander in all directions for most of that day, when they're all supposed to be having the ones the hen-party, the others the stag-party. They keep on going elsewhere, when does the party begin, and where? Dialogues are poor,characters unbelievable, murders far-fetched (the propeller? how do you pull that one off, unbeknown to all present?, the wooden bridge, the booby-trapped boat? sorry, I can't make myself believe anymore...) poor, poor, poor, and boring eventually, it takes more than action and lots of murder to be entertaining/to avoid being boring. I'm sorry I wasted 4 episodes' worth of my time. Don't bother.