Greensleeves This is a wonderful mixture of documentary, drama and vintage material, skilfully inter-weaved to tell us the story of AMG studios. It is fascinating to see these physique films recreated before your very eyes and then masterfully inter-cut with the actual vintage material. It is also sad to see the men who appeared in these movies, at the very peak of their physical beauty, interviewed so many years later when it has all but gone. However, their personalities still shine through and all those interviewed remember their experience in this genre fondly. Technically superb, my one and only reservation about this film is that the actors portraying the models are only vague approximations of the real thing. However, Josh Peace gives a thoroughly charming and charismatic performance as Neil E. O'Hara and Jonathan Torrens is excellent as the mightily naughty David. It would be really nice to have a boxed DVD set of these original films, carefully selected, remastered and presented chronologically. They capture a particular moment in time, far removed from the excesses of today, but still carry a hefty erotic charge.

rob-722 Beefcake is a film that flits between documentary style 'talking heads' and a pseudo-narrative based on the story of Bob Mizer and the rise and fall of his not-so-secret, voyeur-satisfying empire. Throughout the narrative Beefcake does seem to teeter between the subject of pornography and actually becoming soft-core pornography with the plot emphasis less on the subjectivity of the Athletic Model Guild (AMG) industry and more on the gratuitous recreation of poses and scenes from Mizer's original films and photographs. The film was partly funded by Channel 4 / Film Four and felt as if it were a cross between two other Channel 4 programmes: Eurotrash (a popular, long running, mildly pornographic programme that eroticised both sexes) and Queer As Folk (a gay drama series released in the same year as Beefcake). Though it did come under attack from some conservative viewers (and notably Gary Bushell's review in the Sun newspaper helped to ensure that alcoholic drinks company Becks pulled out their ad-break sponsorship of the drama) Queer As Folk managed to attract a large heterosexual audience. Similarly to Beefcake, Queer As Folk explores the subject of underage gay sex, male desirability and the naivety of young people. The difference is though that over the course of the series Queer As Folk tries to morally justify (and in some cases; punish) those who break the patriarchal rules whereas in Beefcake the actions of some of the characters don't seem to be justified at all – to the extent that they're being celebrated or glorified. If Beefcake is more a celebration of homosexuality than an exploration of homosexuality, then it does seems to cut down its audience to a niche.The documentary aspects of this film (the interviews with ex-AMG models) all tend to show the AMG in a positive light. This isn't to say that they shouldn't, or that the interviewees were lying or manipulated, but there are no interviews with any one who opposed the idea of AMG publications at the time, and the nearest we get to a disapproval of the situation is when one of the interviewees claims that Mizer was a 'pervert' but continued working for him because the money was good. There doesn't appear to be two sides to this tale beyond the comparatively small sequence at the end where Mizer is found guilty and his mother is shamed – though this seems to be immediately glossed over with footage that Mizer took in the years after the court case. How can such an unbalanced, bias film be intended for a general audience?Without a coherent moral judgement, a purposely jumbled plot, and a fictional story interspersed with non-fictional interviews of the AMG models, Beefcake becomes a pastiche of the AMG magazines it's exploring and therefore leaves the audience in no position to judge the subject of the film fairly. It becomes a specialist film for someone who had already made their mind up about the situation.Beefcake could be described as a 'feel good film'. This phrase is something that's often attributed to 'gay' films by gay viewers. Beautiful Thing (1996) directed by Hettie MacDonald, is part of the same spectrum of gay cinema in that though there is a plot, it's very, very thin and concentrates on showing the aspects of homosexuality that it explores in a positive light. People like to see characters on screen that they can associate with, so it's no surprise that gay films (and even gay characters) can attract a cult following. Whilst it does (to some extent) counter balance homophobia or under representation in mainstream film, it doesn't necessarily mean that the characters are accurate depictions or that few people will watch the film other than homosexuals as the content is far too specific. Not only is the film about homosexuality, but more importantly it's about homoerotic pornography, a subject that a non-homosexual male might even feel slightly afraid of.Nostalgia is also something played upon heavily in this film through the ex-models and fans of the AMG reminiscing about the now defunct publication. How could you be nostalgic about a time that you didn't remember or didn't agree with in principal in the first place? With out prior knowledge of the marketing, viewing the film alone, you could make a pretty safe assumption through the lack of disavowal that this film was made for a specialist audience. We're also left with no clear idea as to whether Mizer genuinely was interested in male beauty as an art form or whether his only interest was in the pornographic nature of the prints – though the two fields of thought aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.

Gonzalo Melendez (gonz30) Most of the guys interviewed in this documentary wouldn't know who Dorothy is. Even men who cross the (often thin) line between male modeling and hustling do not know that much about campy gay culture. BEEFCAKE deals mostly with this fact. The film is precisely about the detail that most of the models (at least initially) did not realize they were posing mostly for homosexuals. So, it is very unfortunate that catty remarks that may taint a potential viewer's image of the movie are often highlighted. Many Film Critics have done the same before. Tackling stereotypes is also part of BEEFCAKE's agenda, and the movie succeeds in addressing the points I've just mentioned. The flashbacks and dramatization/reconstruction of events are woven into the narrative as well as can be expected. In fact, the editing exceeded my expectations. After all, this type of documentary mixing actual footage, recent interviews, narratives, "faux" past footage, and obviously recreated dramatizations is hardly innovative. But it does work very well here. It is all very coherent. All the added 50s and 60s touches introducing interviewees are actually quite clever. This film defines a period that may have gone forgotten. Dorothy or Judy have nothing to do with this film, except in the head of certain viewers, as in all films. This is one worthwhile documentary mixed with fictionalized events.

isaak-1 entertaining film. peace's naivete and macivor's enthusiasm never waiver as the story unfolds. a visually engaging film! interesting use of archival photos and real life interviews with several of the actual players in the story. do not leave before the end credits are completely finished.