Blotto

1930
7.4| 0h25m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 08 February 1930 Released
Producted By: Hal Roach Studios
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Stan fakes receiving a telegram so he can go to a club with Ollie and a bottle of his unsuspecting wife's liquor, but she overhears his plans.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Hal Roach Studios

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

mark.waltz Laurel and Hardy spend the first half of this film trying to get Laurel from under the watchful eye of his shrewish wife (the beautiful Anita Garvin who perfects the sour disposition of her character) who has forbidden him to leave for the night, but pretending to accept his excuse for an emergency when he does. The second half of the film surrounds her revenge when they succeed, which isn't pretty. Violent but often hysterically funny, this near three reeler shows how the woman who wears the pants in a rather dysfunctional family can get even with lying husbands. It's one of several of their films (shorts or features) which shows the woman in an unfavorable light, but in this age of pre-code comedy, it was all in fun. This has a cartoonish feel to it with the funny but one dimensional wife really stealing the show with her vampish look but evil demeanor. The ending gag doesn't really give a conclusion, but it is a classic.
classicsoncall If you're easily influenced by infectious laughter you could be rolling on the floor by the time this one's over. When Stan goes into his laughing fit he's uncontrollable, and it eventually spills over to affect his buddy Ollie. However the whole premise of the boys going 'blotto' as the title suggests, is all in the mind, as the concoction Stan's wife (Anita Gavin) prepares for them is intended to teach them a terrible lesson rather than get them tipsy. Speaking of which, I couldn't help but notice that one of the ingredients going into the harmless tea potion came from a can of Colman's Mustard. The can hasn't changed appearance in eighty five years!! Talk about longevity.The only distracting thing about this film short turns out to be the couple sitting at a table directly behind Stan and Ollie at the speakeasy. They watch the boys devolve into hysterics and aren't affected in the least bit. You would think they'd at least crack a smile.
hausrathman Ollie hatches a plan to sneak henpecked Stan out for a night on the town with Mrs. Laurel's hidden bottle of liquor. Unfortunately, Mrs. Laurel, played by the always reliable Anita Garvin, overhears the plot and substitutes the liquor for a distasteful combination of her making.Fans and critics tend to be dismissive of film, but I have always found this film to be one of my favorites of their early talkie shorts. There isn't much of a plot, but the sequences are very well-constructed and funny. The interplay between Stan and Anita is very funny. (I like her much better than Linda Loredo, who plays the same role in the Spanish language version.) I also really enjoy Ollie's solo bits on the telephone. Those people who dismiss him as being Stan's straight man should watch that scene. His mannerisms and expressions are priceless.The nightclub sequence is very funny as the boys proceed to get "drunk" on the illicit "alcohol." The best moment is when Stan is reduced to tears by a melancholy song. The boys would go on laughing jags later in the other films, but nowhere is it funnier than in this film, which also ends effectively with a big car gag -- as so many Laurel and Hardy films do!Others may disagree, but I consider this a classic Laurel & Hardy short.
JohnWelles "Blotto" is one of the few underrated Laurel and Hardy shorts. Strange, when you consider that "Below Zero", one of there lesser shorts, to be much more highly appreciated. Stan Laurel in his solo scenes with Mrs Laurel (Anita Garvin) are a revelation. It is quite surprising, as you would have thought that without the other half of the duo, it wouldn't really be very funny. With so much talent for solo performances, I wonder why he entered into a partnership with Oliver Hardy? Still, the scenes later on in the film with Oliver Hardy are just as good and I can't think of any of their films (except the nineteen forties movies they made, under completely different conditions, which didn't allowed them any artistic freedom) that don't have at least a couple of riotous laughs in them. Also, its the only one of their films to have Stan Laurel married, but not Oliver Hardy. A film well worth seeing.