mikelang42 Yes it's total crap,but sometimes total crap can be great fun and this film is.I like Dragons in films, but they have to look like the real deal.I think that most of a low budget went on them and they certainly get full marks.There are alas also some very poor effects of people in obvious fire protection gear being set on fire by said dragons. And then there is the king of low budget romps, the wonderful Mr John Rhys- Davies,playing a king with no food or money and he, just as usual, seems to be having fun. This is not a new film,it played on the teatime slot here in UK on the horror channel august 2011 and i have never heard of it before.Top listed is British actor Maxwell Caulfield who was married to Sir John Mills actress daughter Juliet. He was the star of the awful Grease 2 (1982) and never got any decent parts after that.His wig looks a fright. Script is fun, though to modern for a film set in the 12th century. There is also some Kung Fu for the kids, the film looks OK and the Dragons really are first rate. Harmless fun for the undemanding.

BakuryuuTyranno Once again, people come under attack from dragons and some guys are dispatched to defeat them.Thankfully, this movie isn't anywhere near the level of insufferable boredom "Reign of Fire" had. Actually, despite dragons being majestic and impressive, films featuring dragons rarely reflect similar aspects."Dragon Storm" is surprisingly not based on the screenwriter's "dungeons and dragons" experiences which sets this apart from most similar ones.John Rhys-Davis as usual plays an untrustworthy character, something terribly common, actually. This man succeeds in showing charisma quite well yet often plays unlikable characters.As for storyline, actually there's occasionally long gaps between action scenes although the characters generally have more substance than Syfy's regular films and there is sometimes comic relief. The inclusion of the medieval equivalent of horny drunken teens were pretty amusing.

syrenaUK Well, I had to give this only 3 stars because most of the acting was horrible. Granted, John Rhys-Davies does a fine job ... though I have to wonder why he would choose to be part of this. Perhaps it was fun. Dressing up and fighting dragons? Sure, why not. The dragons (being the primary reason for me watching this) were splendid. I absolutely love dragons, and these were wonderfully done. Apparently the bulk of the budget for this movie went towards CG. As long as you are prepared before watching the movie for all the cheese ... you'll be fine. It might be fun if you watch with a friend and make fun of the various ridiculous parts. Enjoy the dragons!

lodge-the The woodsman was never even shown how to use a bow. The whole film was a total waste of time money and effort. How do they get finance for this kind of movie with such a weak script? some of the animations of the Dragons were good.They should have got rid of the human element. I have seen many SiFi films but sadly this one does not come anywhere near to being of interest to anyone but the brain dead. It was potentially a good subject that could have been made into a classic film but that takes creative effort. Why oh why do highly paid people not see the weaknesses or even the obvious errors (and there were many). Hope there is not to be a sequel.