Find Me

2014 "Some secrets should stay hidden"
4.4| 1h27m| R| en| More Info
Released: 01 September 2014 Released
Producted By: Petri Entertainment
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Before boxes are unpacked in their new home, newlyweds Tim and Emily, find themselves playing a very creepy game of hide and seek with a vengeful spirit.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Petri Entertainment

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Michael Ledo Tim (Cameron Bender) and Emily (Kathryn Lyn) get a good deal on an empty home as Emily returns to her hometown. Even before the ghost appears Emily has bad dreams. She feels connected to the ghost. Tim loves ghost movies and makes allusions to several of them in the film. Meanwhile her childhood friend Claire (Rachelle Dimaria) tries to help out. And what was that book she had? "Seance For Dummies?"Tim gives us sage advice, "Learn to live with it, figure out how to get rid of it, or move.""Find Me" is a ghost film that I didn't find scary. While things get moved around and appeared, our characters didn't get creeped out as it was just another day living with a ghost...except for maybe that one thing or two.About an hour into the film, you get an explanation if you haven't figured it out from the meager clues. The ending seems to have a twist, but it is a nicely written one in that it is really left up to the viewer to decide if there was a twist or not.Worth a view for ghost film fans.Parental Guide: F-bomb. brief sex. No nudity.
Paul Magne Haakonsen "Find Me" is like a soup boiled on a bone that has already lost all flavor. And by that I mean, that the movie takes a concept that has already been used beyond the point of reasonable usage and then brings nothing new to the genre at all.The story is about a young couple, Tim (played by Cameron Bender) and Emily (played by Kathryn Lyn) who have come to buy a house at a really low bargain price. As luck would have it, the house is in Emily's old childhood neighborhood. Gradually things start to happen in the house, and they couple come to realize that they are not alone in their new home.Right, well story-wise, then there is nothing new to be had here if you have seen these kind of haunted movies within the last 10 years or so. In fact, the storyline was actually predictable and you will have the movie figured out not even halfway into it. And the ending, well you will see that coming a mile away as well.What "Find Me" has working for it was the acting and the camera-work. It was lacking scary moments and anything that even remotely would resemble anything spooky.So why watch this one? Well to be honest, then I can't really come up with a reason, unless you have been missing out on haunted movies for the past 10 years or so. But be warned the movie follows the stereotypical guide of 'how to make a haunted movie' guidebook page by page, so don't expect anything innovative or surprising here.Because the movie is so linear and predictable, I am going to have to rate it a mere 3 out of 10 stars.
nabokov95 It's winter in the American Mid West. A young newly married couple, the husband a teacher with a new job at the local school, the wife unemployed, move into their newly purchased first house in the wife's home town. Almost immediately things start to go bump in the night. That suggests a pace the film doesn't have. It's a melancholy, bleak, almost artsy ghost story with shots of empty winter scenery, open skies and dripping icicles. The characters are well played, likable and intelligent, the horror mostly peripheral and special effects sparingly used. There are some genuine unforeseen twists in the plot. It's not a classic of the genre but, considering how bad many films in the genre are, I found it difficult to dislike. Nothing to write home about but, if you don't go in expecting a CGI filled gore fest, it has a bleak charm. 6/10.
chrismackey1972 I saw this, and it was OK. Everything about it was slow. In the beginning, she's looking at a picture for about 10 seconds. They did tend to drag out scenes. It was an hour/26 minutes, but it would've been better had they made it a short film of about 60 minutes. The flow would've been better, and they could've cut out a lot of unnecessary dialogue and gazing at pictures for an unnecessary amount of time. It was entertaining enough, but I did find myself looking at my watch. The acting was good enough, so was the story. Again, they tended to drag out the movie that should've only been about an hour long. Sometimes less is better than more.