Paul Magne Haakonsen Of course The Asylum would have to come up with their own rendering of the 2015 "San Andreas" movie, and thus enters "San Andreas Quake". You already know what you are in for here as soon as you see the logo of The Asylum on the screen. And you know that chances of this movie being a great movie is slim to none.But still, I decided to stick with "San Andreas Quake" and watch it to the end. And having done that now, I can say that it was honestly not as bad as I had initially thought it would turn out. But it is far from being a masterpiece, and it most definitely offers no competition to "San Andreas" which is just in a whole different league.The storyline in "San Andreas Quake", to those unfamiliar with the plot of "San Andreas", is about a discredited seismologist whom has invented a way of measuring earthquakes before they happen, an effective warning system indeed. But when she predicts a 12.7 earthquake to strike Los Angeles, no one takes her claim seriously. Left to her own devices, the races against time in a desperate attempt to get her family to safety before an earthquake of biblical proportions destroys all of Los Angeles.Sure, the storyline was adequate, but as always with The Asylum it is just a shameless rip off of another big blockbuster. And as such, then it is not very inventive or original, and if you have seen the movie that they are imitating, then you have no reason to watch this.The acting in "San Andreas Quake" was alright, and people were doing good enough jobs with their given roles and characters. They were just struggling an uphill battle against a very weak storyline and facing the fact that this was done much better in another movie.As with most movies that come from The Asylum, then the effects are not overly impressive, and were questionable in many cases. The CGI effects were not realistic, and they didn't really give off the impression that this natural disaster was of 12.7 magnitude.It is just another generic disaster movie, and while it is watchable for a single time, then it hardly offers anything worthwhile remembering. "San Andreas Quake" is not a movie that you will watch more than a single time, if you do decide to sit down and actually watch this generic disaster movie.

rps-2 This is one of those rare films that is so bad, so horribly, pathetically, indifferently, illogically, stunningly bad, that it actually is good. I already had voted a generous 2 before I read the "goofs" section which details numerous careless,sloppy and inexcusable errors. What the heck! Let it stand. The plot is inane, predictable and unoriginal.The characters are stereotypes carved in sludge and the acting is on a par with that of commercials for a sleazy car lot. Even the special effects --- collapsing buildings, crumbling bridges and plunging elevators --- special DEfects --- appear to have been done on a Commodore 64. Indeed, one wonders if the whole thing is really a very well done and hilarious satire of appallingly bad sci-fi movies. Maybe they should re-issue it as such.

Michael Golden Contains spoilers!! This movie is a perfect candidate for Mystery Science Theater. Watched it to kill time while I did other things but found myself compelled to watch the terribleness of this movie. I actually thought Sharknado was a good laugh, and went into this one hoping for the same, but, WOW, what a junk pile.I half expected a chopper to appear at the end with a guy waving a baby around to get their attention, but it ended so much better. The dog was a perfect slap in the face to the viewer and I applaud the creators for being so daring.It's a good giggle but you'll have more fun picking out all the continuity errors and hell, just making up your own jokes.

Werauskas Tabanis OK, -censored- is this? Your review does not contain enough lines - the minimum length for reviews is 10 lines of text!!!OK!Here we go... By submitting this review you are agreeing to the terms laid out in our Copyright Statement. Your submission must be your own original work. Your review will normally be posted on the site within 2-3 business days. Reviews that do not meet the guidelines will not be posted. Please write in English only. HTML or boards mark-up is not supported though paragraph breaks will be inserted if you leave a blank line between paragraph. Had to!