South62 The train has to be stopped. Every single train in world has an emergency break in every compartment and even in bathrooms. It just has to be said above all other holes in the plot. So, the main problem of the plot was very easy to manage. Another example: It is very unprofessional for government intelligence agency to hire intimately close people in same action. I am talking about the blonde girl in headquarters and her boyfriend on the field. It just could not work. I do not like when movie-makers think that audience is stupid. Anyway, I intentionally forgot all stupid things and had fun watching this. Everybody has to see This. We should not forget how the really awful movie looks like. But... Kimberley Davies looks very perfect. I do not care if she does not know how to act. Finally, she was the reason I did not turned it off.

doriangreynl First, when I read the plot summary, I thought: a hijacked passenger train? That's gotta be an Under Siege 2 rip-off. And how amazing, it absolutely is. We got the train being hijacked, we got a lone hero who's swerving all over the train trying to stop the bad guys, we got the blonde chick who actually does resemble Katherine Heigl, and we got a counter-terrorism unit that tries to figure out how to stop the train.But Seconds to Spare is much, much inferior to Steven Seagals masterpiece. Kimberley Davies is just a bit too old to be a real good chick, and Paul Blake is just ridiculous as the hero. The best illustration for this is when he's fighting with one bad guy on the car-carriage and he desperately tries to break the bad guy's neck (and fails). Surely Steven wouldn't have allowed the rogue to get away. It's the same with the rest of the Seagal-imitating that Blake pulls off. Walking over the roof of the train really costs him a lot of effort; remember Steven strolling along the roof as if it were a day in the park? Or Blake hanging on the side of the train, trying to get a hold of some lever? Seagal and Morris Chestnut did the same in US2, but at least they were getting somewhere and weren't wasting their time bungling from the train for 15 minutes.Talking about these bad guys: that's really the low point of the movie. In Under Siege 2, you just gotta love Everett McGill and Eric Bogosian; especially Bogosian might arguably the best villain in cinema history. But the scam that we're looking at in Seconds to Spare is nothing more than that. We're to believe that some eco-terrorists (!) hijacked a passenger train, and that they want to release some nerve gas in Sydney to kill 5 million people (talking about ecological disaster huh?). Then the bad girl gets cold feet, and subsequently we're annoyed with some sort of psychological storyline about whether it makes sense to try and save humanity from its own destruction of planet earth. I don't care if you want to get in depth about ecological problems, but please, make it worth while.Oh, and then we got the counter-terrorism units. We're supposed to believe that this whole operation trying to stop the train, is run by ONE guy in his 50s, assisted by some blonde in her early 20s. So when this guy decides the train should be bombed before it reaches Sydney, possibly killing 30 people, he absolutely doesn't have to get any green light from military or government officials. Besides, the blonde is fully supportive of the decision, since the terrorists shot her soldier boyfriend out of his helicopter. Even more hilarious: the boyfriend appears to run the whole anti-terrorism unit on the ground by himself. He drives the jeeps, flies the helicopters, takes the sniper guns etc. etc. Some marine! I really don't know what got into the heads of the makers of this movie, even though I must say I enjoyed watching all these huge plot holes and irregularities. On the other hand: it again proves what an exceptional influential filmmaker Steven Seagal is. And it again makes you realize what a great filmmaker he is.

Libretio SECONDS TO SPARE Aspect ratio: 1.78:1Sound format: StereoAfter serving time in prison on a trumped-up charge of corruption, an ex-DEA officer (Antonio Sabato Jr.) travels to Australia in search of the man responsible for his ordeal (Jerome Ehlers), a rogue CIA agent who has hijacked a passenger train and is threatening to detonate a nerve bomb in the heart of Sydney...Antonio Sabato Jr. is the perfect action hero: He's dark and handsome, and he can kick butt with the best of 'em. The only 'trouble' is his chest - he's got the best pecs in the business, and his costume designer knows it. When he wears a tight-fitting T-shirt (as he does frequently throughout this opportunistic mini-epic), or - better still - when he isn't wearing a shirt at all (there's only one gratuitous 'topless' scene, but welcome nonetheless!), some viewers will be hopelessly distracted by the size, shape and all-round magnificence of those plate-sized pectorals. Thankfully, Sabato wears another (loose fitting) shirt just long enough for Brian Trenchard-Smith's ho-hum actioner to emerge into some kind of focus, and while there's nothing new in either the script (by Trenchard-Smith and Dennis Pratt) or direction, the movie contains enough explosions and punch-ups to satisfy the target audience. Former soap star Kimberley Davies (sporting a rather magnificent chest of her own!) is Sabato's potential love interest, prone to falling into the wrong hands and being rescued by her hunky would-be boyfriend, while Kate Beahan suffers gracefully as Ehler's naive associate, a good-hearted soul who realizes - too late! - the hijack will end in disaster for millions of innocent people. Professional in all departments, the movie is no more than a routine time-waster, but Sabato's pumped-up torso is worth endless repeat viewings. Drool, slobber...

Theo Robertson If I have a problem with the modern environmental movement it`s with their pacifism at all costs stance . You see the modern environmental movement was founded by quakers who`s ethos of non violence is the primary idealogy of the green movement . This is to critical free thinkers a flawed ideal , after all how you going to deal with evil men like Adolph Hitler and Osama Bin Laden without using force ? So it`s totally ironic that films always portray environmentalists as gun toting nutters . Can anyone remember these stupid holistic minded thrillers where Steven Seagal shows the world that ecology is all about blowing away everyone who works for an oil company ? Well it`s the same with SECONDS TO SPARE though thankfully someone came up with a great idea to make the greenies the bad guys !!!!! MILD SPOILERS !!!!! There`s some really twisted logic in this movie . The eco-terrorist leader Eve is against violence so she and her cohorts join up with a former CIA man ( Has there ever been a film where a former CIA man is shown in a good light ? ) and a Serbian war criminal ( Has there ever been a film where Serbs aren`t war criminals ) get some guns , steal a large amount of nerve gas , blow up a nerve disposal unit killing everyone inside , hijack a train to use it as a missile , and it`s only then Eve realises she`s taking part in something a little more serious than a sit down protest ! Duh hello , Earth to Eve ? I suppose her full name must be Naive ? As for the rest of SECONDS TO SPARE it`s basically one of those generic " Hero on a train that`s full of hostages " thrillers , a bit like DEATH TRAIN or UNDER SIEGE 2 so it plays out in a fairly predictable manner as with scene of bad guy taking pretty blonde hostage to quiet part of train to rape her but hero pops up and kills bad guy ,and scene with man in charge of operation making decision to save millions by sacrificing the hostages on the train . You`ve more chance of seeing Patrick Moore and Bjorn Lomborg rejoining Greenpeace than you have seeing the bad guys carry out their dastardly plan in this type of film