Sundays at Tiffany's

2010
6.5| 1h28m| en| More Info
Released: 06 December 2010 Released
Producted By: Dan Wigutow Productions
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://www.mylifetime.com/movies/sundays-at-tiffanys
Synopsis

Jane, a soon-to-be-married woman, is reunited with her imaginary friend Michael who returns in a human form. Soon, Jane begins doubting her feelings for her fiance as she gets attracted to Michael.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Dan Wigutow Productions

Trailers & Images

Reviews

SnoopyStyle Jane Claremont (Emily Alyn Lind) has imaginary friend Michael. Her mother Vivienne (Stockard Channing) takes her to Tiffany's for her 10th birthday. It's time for Michael to leave her. Twenty years later, Jane (Alyssa Milano) is marrying TV star Hugh Morrison (Ivan Sergei) when her imaginary friend Michael (Eric Winter) reappears. He's sure that she needs him for some reason. She doesn't believe him and seeks help from her psychiatrist friend Jaqueline (Kristin Booth).This Lifetime TV movie has an intriguing premise. With Tiffany's being such a prominent landmark in the story, this needs to be shot in NYC especially the exterior shots. As for the story, Hugh needs to be more of a douche. Other than being self-obsessed, he doesn't seem to be horribly bad. There has to be a bigger reason for Michael to return. As for falling in love with Michael, there needs to be a more in-depth look into the life of imaginary friends. The intriguing premise should lead to something more compelling than this.
karenthomas61 Delightful premise. Eric Winter does a very good job playing an innocent child-like spirit in an adult body. He plays those scenes with zest and energy. The script has some cute scenes and dialogue based on that premise. Eric Winter and Alyssa Milano have excellent chemistry as best friends.There are some clichés in this film: The fiancé is a selfish and vain man, who does not appreciate the protagonist's true self. The protagonist gave up on her dreams and took a safe boring path through life. Not every scene works but still a pleasant film.Stockard Channing is a great performer, but this role does not use her superlative talent.Alyssa Milano plays down her sexiness to play a regular career girl. She is quite good in this role.
edwagreen Reality and fantasy are the major themes here which seem to connect. Imagine that her imaginary boyfriend leaves her at age 10, and resurfaces 20 years later when she is about to wed a Broadway legend, who is also Hollywood bound. The guy is a hunk and a writer to the bargain as well.When imaginary friend Michael resurfaces after all these years, he can be seen by everyone and immediately there is jealousy between the couple as Michael intervenes.This is a tale of true love, gone awry and with the old theme of following your basic instincts.Stockard Channing co-stars as the successful mother of Jane, who was abandoned by her own husband years before.The story is really somewhat hard to take. The last scene where Jane walks out at her wedding reminded me of 1967's "The Graduate." At least, that was reality based. We might have even needed Mrs. Robinson to heat things up.
Audrey O'Donnell (chicaangel88) In essence this movie was good. But if you are a fan of the book, do yourself a favor and just don't watch it! I loved the book and so did my sister, we read the book together at night and was captured in the story lines. This book almost has nothing to do with movie! The only comparisons I can see is that there is a Jane and a Michael who was her imaginary friend as a child. Other then that, the story is completely different. It portrays Michael as somewhat of a beggar/homeless man who depends on the kindness of Jane through out the movie. Michael depends on Jane for meals and follows her like a stalker/hopeless puppy. So not how the book made Michael out to be. And the switch over from imaginary to human, you might as well forget Michael even existed as imaginary. Good OK story line. Just don't hope for it following the book even at all. Seeing as the book had so much potential, this movie, frankly, does not.